Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Students Legal Awareness of The Prohibition of Online Gender-Based Violence (Study at Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman) Nandita Uttami, Shakira; Lisiani Prihatinah, Tri; Musyahadah Rahmah, Alef
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 3 Nomor 2 2024
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v3i2.1333

Abstract

This research aims to determine the level of students' legal awareness regarding the prohibition of Online Gender-Based Violence as well as the influence of disciplinary factors, socialization intensity factors, and religious piety factors on students' legal awareness regarding the prohibition of Online Gender-Based Violence at the Faculty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman University. This research uses quantitative research methods with a sociological juridical approach and descriptive research specifications. Types and sources of data include primary data and secondary data obtained using questionnaire, documentary and library methods. The research results show that the level of legal awareness of students regarding the prohibition of Online Gender-Based Violence at the Faculty of Law, Jenderal Soedirman University is high. This is proven by the results of research on 4 (four) indicators including the high level of student legal knowledge, the high level of student legal understanding, the number of students' legal attitudes that agree, and the number of students' legal behavior that is in accordance with the prohibition of Online Gender-Based Violence. Discipline factors, socialization intensity factors and religious piety factors have a positive influence on students' level of legal awareness regarding the prohibition of Online Gender-Based Violence.
Reassessing the Legal Validity of Non-Notarial Gifts Between Parents and Children Under Indonesian Law: A Doctrinal and Judicial Perspective Yuningsih, Yuyun; Lisiani Prihatinah, Tri; Sulistyandari
Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum In Concreto Volume 4 Nomor 1 2025
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Harapan Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35960/inconcreto.v4i1.1826

Abstract

Gifts (hibah) from parents to children are a common practice within family legal relations in Indonesia. However, the frequent execution of such gifts without notarial deeds raises serious concerns regarding their legal validity and the protection of other heirs' rights. This study reassesses the legal status of non-notarial gifts within the framework of Indonesian civil law and Islamic inheritance law. Employing a normative legal method through doctrinal and jurisprudential approaches, the research analyzes statutory provisions and judicial decisions to evaluate the enforceability and evidentiary strength of gifts made without authentic deeds. The findings reveal that non-notarial gifts generally fail to meet the formal legal requirements under Indonesian positive law, and are often declared invalid by courts, particularly when challenged by other heirs. Consequently, such gifts may infringe upon the legitime portie (compulsory inheritance share) and trigger intra-family inheritance disputes. This study asserts that legal formalities are not mere administrative procedures but serve as essential instruments to uphold legal certainty, balance competing interests, and achieve intergenerational justice. Accordingly, it recommends enhancing public legal literacy, expanding access to notarial services, and reforming regulatory frameworks to align customary practices with adequate legal protection.
The Role of the Land Deed Maker in the Validity of Land Grant Deeds Hermawaty, Yenni; Lisiani Prihatinah, Tri; Sulistyandari, Sulistyandari
Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/enrichment.v2i3.112

Abstract

As public officials, Land Deed Officials (PPAT, Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah) must comply with the rules in the PPAT Position Regulation, including the primary duties, authorities, prohibitions, and PPAT Code of Ethics. This study examines the role of PPAT and the legal consequences of grant deeds canceled by the panel of judges in Supreme Court Decision Number 503K/Ag/2015. This type of research is normative juridical with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The data used is secondary data from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show that Muslim Indonesians are subject to the rules in the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law and use the Religious Courts to resolve disputes. Grant legal acts must be legalized with a Grant Deed, which is the authority of PPAT. In making a Grant Deed, the PPAT must examine the origin of the granted property. The pillars and conditions of grants in KHI and KHES are cumulative and must be fulfilled. The grant can be canceled if one of the elements is not fulfilled. In the case of grant deed Number 112/II/GB/2003, the PPAT needed to fully carry out its role correctly. Despite having carried out duties by several articles in Government Regulation No. 37/1998 jo PP No. 24/2016, the PPAT violated Article 22 and the precautionary principle in the PPAT Code of Ethics. As a result, the grant deed was declared to have no legal force by the Panel of Judges of the Supreme Court. This research shows that violations by PPAT in making grant deeds can cause the deed to be invalid and null and void, eliminating legal certainty for the parties involved. PPAT's adherence to the rules and the precautionary principle is essential to ensure the legal validity of the deed made.