Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pengelolaan Cagar Budaya Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Otonomi Daerah (Studi Hukum Kawasan Candi Borobudur Dan Prambanan) Gustafia Hutabarat, Dolli; Edi Subiyanto, Achmad
Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara (JPkMN)
Publisher : Lembaga Dongan Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55338/jpkmn.v5i1.2890

Abstract

Dalam pengelolaan candi borobudur dan candi prambanan sendiri masih terdapat beberapa permasalahan, salah satunya dari sistem hukum yang mengatur pengelolaan itu sendiri, dimana dalam pengelolaannya dilaksanakan berdasarkan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1992 tentang Pengelolaan Taman Wisata Candi Borobudur dan Taman Wisata Candi Prambanan Serta Pengendalian Lingkungan Kawasannya. Dalam Keputusan Presiden tersebut pengelolan Candi Borobuddur  dan Candi Prambanan dilaksanakan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan (Zona 1), BUMN (Zona 2), dan Pemerintah Daerah (Zona 3) meskipun pada tahun 2010 telah ditetapkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya yang menyatakan bahwa pengelolaan kawasan cagar budaya dilaksanakan oleh Badan Pengelola. Keterlibatan pemerintah daerah juga sangat minim serta peran serta masyarakat hampir tidak ada dalam pengelolaan candi borobudur dan candi prambanan. Tujuan dilaksanakannya penelitian ini adalah menganalisis dan menerangkan tinjauan hukum terhadap pengelolaan Candi Borobudur dan Candi Prambanan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian kepustakaan yang pengumpulan datanya dengan cara membaca, mencatat, serta mengkaji bahan penelitian data pustaka. Pembatasan kewenangan pemerintah daerah dalam pengelolaan candi borobudur dan Prambanan tentu tidak sejalan dengan konsep otonomi daerah yang pada dasarnya bertujuan untuk menyejahterakan masyarakat.
Appointment of Acting Regional Heads by The Central Government: Analysis of Authority and Principles of Local Democracy Lumba Agung Masben; Edi Subiyanto, Achmad
International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : CV. Inara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijse.v6i1.352

Abstract

The appointment of an Acting Regional Head by the Central Government during the transition period of the 2024 National Simultaneous Regional Elections has sparked constitutional controversy regarding government authority and alignment with the principles of local democracy and decentralization. This study aims to examine the legal construction of the Central Government's authority in appointing Acting Regional Heads. In addition, this study also seeks to evaluate the suitability of this practice with the principles of democracy and decentralization as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. The method used in this study is a normative legal research method, by applying a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal sources that are the object of analysis include the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 10 of 2016, Law No. 23 of 2014, and Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs No. 4 of 2023, Constitutional Court decisions, and scientific literature related to the theory of authority and democracy. The results of the study indicate that the authority of the Central Government in appointing Acting Regional Heads is formally attributive and meets the principle of legality. However, the regulatory framework still leaves serious issues related to the limits of authority, selection mechanisms, accountability, and minimal participation by the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) and local communities. This situation creates a deficit in democratic legitimacy and a tendency towards recentralization, which has the potential to undermine the principle of regional autonomy. This study concludes that the appointment of Acting Regional Heads is formally constitutional but problematic from a democratic and decentralized perspective, necessitating a reconstruction of the appointment mechanism to align with the principles of local democracy and a democratic state based on the rule of law.