Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal INJIES: Journal of Islamic Education Studies Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean
Hafizi, Muhammad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Critical Analysis of The Rejection of Richard Bell's Thoughts on The Translation of The Qur'an in The Context of Orientalism Abiyusuf, Ilham; Hafizi, Muhammad; Pakhrurrozi, Pakhrurrozi; Saputra, Wahyu; Hermanto, Edi
INJIES: Journal of Islamic Education Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): December
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/injies.v1i2.6

Abstract

Richard Bell is a well-known English orientalist who focuses his research on the Qur'an with a critical academic approach. Bell's approach involves methods of historical, linguistic, and critical analysis to understand the Quran in historical and cultural contexts. However, this approach raises rejection from Muslim scholars who believe that the Bell method is inadequate to understanding the true meaning of the Quran as divine revelation. this study is to study the rejection of the approach of Richard Bell in the interpretation of the Qur'an by Muslim scholars and scientists. The main objective is to understand the basics of the arguments used in this denial and to evaluate its compatibility with the basic principles in interpreting the Quran according to the Islamic tradition. This research methodology uses a qualitative approach with methods of document analysis. Data is obtained from literature that deals with the works and approaches of Richard Bell, as well as texts that explain the views of Muslim scholars and academics on the interpretation of the Qur'an. The analysis was conducted to identify points of rejection of the Bell method and to evaluate the underlying arguments. Muslim scholars reject Richard Bell's approach to the Quran because they believe it doesn't fully respect the Quran as divine revelation. They think his methods are too focused on history and criticism, not capturing the Quran's true meaning. They prefer interpretations that consider the context of revelation, Prophet Muhammad's explanations, and see the Quran as a unified whole. They also doubt Bell's historical criticism and say Western academic methods have limits in understanding religious texts. Overall, they find Bell's approach doesn't fit Islamic principles of Quran interpretation.The rejection of Richard Bell's approach to the interpretation of the Qur'an is based on the belief that its historical and critical methods are insufficient to understand the true meaning of this sacred text.
Critical Analysis of the Rejection of Richard Bell's Thoughts on the Translation of the Qur'an in the Context of Orientalism Abiyusuf, Ilham; Hafizi, Muhammad; Pakhrurrozi, Pakhrurrozi; Saputra, Wahyu; Hermanto, Edi
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i3.1130

Abstract

Background. Richard Bell, a prominent English orientalist, applied historical, linguistic, and critical analysis to study the Qur'an in its historical and cultural contexts. However, his approach faced rejection from Muslim scholars, who argue that Bell's method fails to capture the Qur'an's true meaning as divine revelation. Purpose. This study examines the rejection of Richard Bell's approach by Muslim scholars and scientists, aiming to understand the key arguments behind their opposition and evaluate its alignment with Islamic principles of Qur'anic interpretation. Method. A qualitative approach is used, employing document analysis to review literature on Bell's works and methods, as well as texts outlining the views of Muslim scholars on Qur'anic interpretation. The analysis focuses on identifying the points of rejection and evaluating the reasoning behind them. Results Muslim scholars reject Bell's approach because they believe it lacks respect for the Qur'an as divine revelation. They argue that his focus on historical criticism overlooks the context of revelation and Prophet Muhammad's explanations. They see the Qur'an as a unified whole and question the applicability of Western academic methods to understanding religious texts. Ultimately, they find Bell's approach incompatible with Islamic principles of interpretation. Conclusion. Muslim scholars reject Richard Bell's historical and critical methods, asserting that these approaches are insufficient to grasp the true meaning of the Qur'an as a sacred text.
Comparison of the Definition of remembrance based on verse 152 of surah Al-Baqarah through Tafsir Jalallain and Tafsir Ibn Kathir Pakhrurrozi, Pakhrurrozi; Hafizi, Muhammad; Akbar Bin Usman, Ali
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sustainability Asean Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/ijmsa.v1i4.1496

Abstract

Background.  This study discusses the comparison of the meaning of remembrance based on verse 152 of surah Al-Baqarah through the perspective of two classic tafsir books, namely Tafsir Jalalain and Tafsir Ibn Kathir. This verse emphasizes the importance of remembering Allah as a form of gratitude and obedience. By examining these two commentaries, this research aims to explore the mufassirs' understanding of the concept of remembrance and how it is applied in everyday life. Purpose.. This study aims to analyze and compare the interpretations of dhikr (remembrance of Allah) in verse 152 of Surah Al-Baqarah as presented in Tafsir Jalalain and Tafsir Ibn Kathir. By examining these perspectives, it seeks to reveal their similarities and differences, highlighting the significance of dhikr in the spiritual and daily lives of Muslims. Method.  Examining dhikr according to Tafsir Jalalain, focusing on the form of worship that includes the tongue, heart, and actions, as well as its reward from Allah. Examining dhikr in Tafsir Ibn Kathir as a broad form of worship that invites Allah's protection, as well as the importance of gratitude. Comparing the two commentaries to understand the similarities and differences related to dhikr and gratitude. Results. Tafsir Jalalain and Ibn Kathir agree that dhikr is a comprehensive act of worship (verbal, heart, and deeds), which is rewarded with Allah's mercy. Zikr also includes gratitude as a form of obedience to His favors. Conclusion. The comparison of dhikr interpretations in Tafsir Jalalain and Tafsir Ibn Kathir reveals both similarities and differences. Tafsir Jalalain offers a clear explanation, focusing on dhikr as gratitude and obedience. In contrast, Tafsir Ibn Kathir provides a detailed context through hadith and scholarly views. Both agree on dhikr's crucial role in deepening spiritual connections with Allah and achieving peace and happiness in this life and the hereafter.
Co-Authors Abiyusuf, Ilham Akbar Bin Usman, Ali HERMANTO, EDI Pakhrurrozi, Pakhrurrozi Wahyu Saputra