Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Credential Method as A Measurement Tool for Nurses' Professionalism in A Hospital Sujiyanti, Sujiyanti; Pratiwi, Arum; Sugiharto, Sugiharto
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v6i1.2913

Abstract

Credentials as an effort to maintain nurse competency and become the basis for granting clinical authority to nurses have not been implemented well. Implementation of processes for achieving goals varies across institutions. This research aims to identify the relationship between credentialing methods and the outcomes of the Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) by investigating differences in OPPE scores based on years of experience. This is a quantitative research study with a descriptive correlational and comparative approach, involving 66 respondents who meet the criteria: Nurse PK I; less than 5 years of experience. Data analysis was conducted using Rank Spearman correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests. The credentialing test method used a portfolio, interview, written test, and practical examination. The research results indicate that 48.48% of credentialing is done using these four methods. The majority of OPPE scores are rated as Good, accounting for 66.67%. The longer a nurse works, the better their performance rating. The Spearman rank test obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.353 with p= 0.004 (p<0.05), and the Kruskal-Wallis test obtained a Kruskal-Wallis value of 41.289 with p=0.000 (p<0.05). Conclusion: There is a relationship between credentialing methods and OPPE scores. The more credentialing methods used, the better the OPPE scores.
Analysis of Credential Methods with the Value of Ongoing Practice Professionalism Evaluation in A Private Hospital in Surakarta Sujiyanti, Sujiyanti; Suyamto, Suyamto
Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Indonesian Journal of Global Health Research
Publisher : GLOBAL HEALTH SCIENCE GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37287/ijghr.v6i3.3203

Abstract

Nurses as professionals have a very important clinical role in realizing quality services oriented towards patient safety. To improve their performance, nurses are required to continuously improve their professionalism. Nurse performance is assessed using the Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) assessment. Credentials are an effort to maintain the professionalism of nurses, but their implementation still varies. The credential method is carried out through several methods, namely viewing portfolios, interviews, written exams and practical exams. This study aims to determine differences in OPPE scores for nurses in the three groups of credentialing methods used. This research is a comparative descriptive study that compares OPPE in three groups of respondents who used the credential method, namely the group that used portfolios and interviews, portfolios, interviews and written tests; as well as portfolios, interviews, written exams and practical exams. The results of research on 60 respondents showed that the majority were aged 26 – 30 years (56.06%), female (66.7%), had a D3 education in Nursing (71.1%). The majority of OPPE scores are Good (66.67%) and the longer the nurse works, the better the performance score. There are differences in OPPE values for respondents who were credentialed using method 1, method 2 and method 3. The more credential methods used, the better the OPPE value obtained.