Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PERBEDAAN GENDER TERHADAP KECANDUAN INTERNET DAN GAME ONLINE PADA REMAJA Fitra Fitriani; Erina Dwi Saputri; Mayang Permata Sari; Rio Anugrah; Apriyadi
Journal of Communication and Social Sciences Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Journal of Communication and Social Sciences
Publisher : CV. Doki Course and Training

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61994/jcss.v1i2.330

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat kecanduan internet dan bermain game online pada remaja yang ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Kecanduan internet dan kecanduan bermain game online pada remaja ditinjau dari rentang usia yang pertama 12-15 Tahun, 15-18 Tahun, 18-21 Tahun yang juga ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode Kuantitatif, penelitian ini melibatkan 111 responden (berusia dari 12 Tahun hingga 21 Tahun) adapun jumlah responden dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 65,8% dengan gender Perempuan dan 34,2% responden dengan gender Laki-Laki. Variabel kecanduan internet menggunakan Internet Addiction Test (IAT) yang dikembangkan oleh Kimberly Young‚ (1996) dan diadaptasi oleh Adi (2003) dengan 10 item. Dari hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Perempuan cenderung lebih kecanduan internet dan game online dibandingkan dengan Laki-Laki, hal ini menunjukkan bahwa semakin dewasa seseorang, tingkat kecanduan internet dan game online cenderung berkurang. 
Urgensi Revitalisasi Fungsi Pengawasan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat untuk Menguatkan Check and Balances Widodo; Erina Dwi Saputri
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 4 JULI 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper examines the growing dominance of the executive in Indonesia’s constitutional practice and its impact on the weakening oversight function of the House of Representatives (DPR). In principle, the DPR serves as a counterbalance through checks and balances as mandated by the 1945 Constitution. However, a gap persists between this normative ideal and political reality. Using a normative legal approach with statutory and conceptual analysis, this study finds that broad governing coalitions significantly undermine the DPR’s oversight role by blurring the distinction between the overseer and the overseen. The article emphasizes the need to revitalize the DPR’s oversight function by strengthening control mechanisms, fostering informal opposition within parliamentary factions, and limiting executive influence in legislation. These steps are necessary to ensure that checks and balances function not only formally but also substantively in Indonesia’s constitutional system.
Pengawasan Keuangan Negara terhadap BUMN Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang BUMN: Rekonstruksi Pengawasan dari Pendekatan Public Audit Menuju Good Corporate Governance Erina Dwi Saputri; Widodo
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 5 SEPTEMBER 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The amendment of the State-Owned Enterprises Law through Law Number 1 of 2025 has brought changes to the paradigm of governance and oversight of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). SOEs operate at the intersection of public and private law regimes, creating challenges in determining the boundaries between the state's interests as a shareholder and the authority of SOEs as corporate legal entities. This study aims to analyze the state financial oversight system for SOEs before and after the amendment of the SOE Law and to formulate an oversight model capable of balancing public accountability with the principles of Good Corporate Governance. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Legal materials are analyzed prescriptively through an examination of legislation, legal theories, principles, doctrines, and a comparative study ofState-Owned Enterprise governance in Singapore. The findings indicate that the regulatory changes concerning SOEs have encouraged a paradigm shift from an oversight model predominantly based on public audit toward an approach emphasizing corporate principles,the business judgment rule, and corporate value creation. Nevertheless, a dualism remains between the state finance law regime and the corporate law regime, potentially resulting in overlapping supervisory authority and legal uncertainty for SOE organs. Therefore, a clearer distinction is required between public oversight, which focuses on the state's interests as a shareholder, and corporate oversight, which focuses on the company's operational activities. This model should be supported by risk-based oversight, harmonization of relevant legislation, and coordination among supervisory institutions in order to ensure public accountability while providing legal certainty and sufficient flexibility for SOEs to conduct their business activities.