Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Rizki, Inneke Kiki
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Justice on Trial: How Artificial Intelligence is Reshaping Judicial Decision-Making Andriati, Syarifah Lisa; Rizki, Inneke Kiki; Malian, Ain Najwa Binti Mohd
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Reforming Legal Frameworks: Justice, Rights, and Innovation in Indonesia and Be
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v9i2.13683

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial decision-making processes is reshaping the administration of justice, offering new possibilities for efficiency and consistency while raising critical concerns about fairness and judicial discretion. This research explores the use of AI to support judges in their decision-making processes, focusing on the balance between technological assistance and the human consideration of justice. Additionally, it examines the regulatory frameworks that enable and govern AI’s role in the judiciary. Employing a normative juridical research methodology and secondary data from literature reviews, this study finds that AI systems can only assist judges by providing recommendations rather than replacing their judgment. Algorithms and mathematical models cannot fully account for the complex, qualitative factors inherent in the pursuit of justice, such as moral considerations, empathy, and societal context. Currently, AI usage in judicial processes is not explicitly regulated; however, it may be justified under Article 1 Point 8 of Indonesia’s ITE Law, which recognizes electronic agents controlled by humans to achieve specified objectives. The research underscores that AI’s potential lies in its capacity to complement human judges by enhancing efficiency and reducing bias in routine tasks, while ultimate decision-making must remain a human responsibility. This study concludes that the responsible use of AI, guided by clear legal and ethical frameworks, can ensure that technological advancements in the judiciary uphold the principles of justice and human dignity.
PENGGUNAAN METODE SOCRATES DALAM MENGEMBANGKAN PENDIDIKAN TINGGI HUKUM DI INDONESIA Andriati, Syarifah Lisa; Rizki, Inneke Kiki; Binti Mohd Malian, Ain Najwa
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The ability to think critically and have the ability as a problem solver is needed in higher education Law in Indonesia. One of the methods used is the Socratic Method. Critical thinking is one of the aspects that law students must have to improve their ability as problem solvers. This research was conducted to contribute that the application of the Socratic method is effective to be applied in the learning process of higher education in Indonesia, as well as to provide evaluation and knowledge about the challenges and obstacles that will be faced in the process of applying the Socratic method in the legal higher education environment in Indonesia. The research method used is legal research, namely by collecting data and references from various sources, then it is arranged systematically through normative juridical analysis. This research produces knowledge that the use of the Socratic method was first carried out in law school by Christopher Columbus Langdell at Harvard University in 1870-1895. The use of the socratic method is useful to help students learn how to use critical thinking skills in analyzing a case, this method is needed to increase self-confidence and practice public speaking skills. The challenges and obstacles in using this method are that there are still educators who ask questions without direction, the need for traditional lecture methods to enhance the socratic method and the need for evidence-based research that is useful for strengthening students' arguments when analyzing a case.
Co-Authors Binti Mohd Malian, Ain Najwa Malian, Ain Najwa Binti Mohd Syarifah Lisa Andriati