p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Termination of a Criminal Case (Criminal Prosecution) Due to the Imposition of a Court Fine Volevodz, Alexander; Ivanov, Dmitriy; Polyakov, Sergey; Bezryadin, Viktor; Alyshkin, Vladislav
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v11i2.34007

Abstract

Criminal cases in Russia often hinge on a critical decision during the preliminary investigation stage: whether to proceed to trial or terminate the case. While various grounds for termination exist, one central condition revolves around the compensation or reparation for harm caused by the crime. This article examines the termination of criminal cases through court fines to compensate for the damage caused by crimes. The research utilizes the general scientific method of cognition for detailed examination and analysis, the systematic approach method for procedural considerations, and methods of analysis and synthesis to identify law enforcement challenges. The study systematically analyses the legal provisions and judicial practices related to imposing court fines since 2016. Results indicate that total compensation for harm is crucial for applying termination grounds under Article 25.1 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Voluntary harm compensation often leads to the termination of criminal cases, effectively preventing the creation of a criminal record for the accused.
Restitution as a Prerequisite for Case Termination: Analyzing Conditional Exoneration in Russian Criminal Procedure Grinenko, Aleksandr; Ivanov, Dmitriy; Kleshchina, Elena; Alyshkin, Vladislav; Bezryadin, Viktor
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v12i1.37741

Abstract

In this scholarly article, the researchers methodically examine the protocols involved in discontinuing criminal cases through the conciliation of the involved parties, as well as ceasing criminal prosecution on the grounds of active contrition, contingent upon the pivotal requirement of recompensing the damage inflicted by the criminal act. The study substantiates that the investigator, or the individual responsible for the preliminary inquiry, bears the mandatory duty to ascertain, via investigative measures, that the injury wrought by the criminal offence has been comprehensively redressed. The authors delineate that the transcript of the victim's interrogation is the most prevalent procedural document, signifying that the conciliation procedures are mutually satisfactory, voluntary, and indicative of the parties' willingness and preparedness to reconcile. Conclusively, the authors infer that exemption from criminal accountability and the consequent cessation of the criminal case, predicated upon reconciliation or earnest remorse, is contingent upon the substantiated evidence of actual compensation for the harm engendered by the criminally punishable deed.