Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Designing Masculinity: The Role of Typography in Constructing Power, Strength, and Dominance in Product Branding Hendri Hartono; Eko Hadi Wahyono; Emmanuel Putro Prakoso; Taufiq Annas; Nur Sitha Afrilia
Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/concept.v5i2.2944

Abstract

Typography has communicated messages through images displayed on a package. The thickness of the letterforms, the sharpness of their corners, and the proportions in the placement of symbols carry meaning. These characteristics not only convey information but also shape an identity. This study highlights how the systematic process of typography in producing masculine meanings in product branding. Therefore, this study developed the Typographic Masculinity Index (TMI), an original semi-quantitative framework, and then applied it to eight male-oriented brands spanning the energy drink and grooming product categories: Red Bull, Extra Joss, Monster Energy, Warrior Energy, AXE, Old Spice, Gillette, and Biore Men. This analysis is based on Roland Barthes' visual semiotics and R.W. Connell's theory of hegemonic masculinity. The research findings confirm that bold, sharp-angled, condensed typographic forms and the use of capital letters consistently function as visual codes for authority, power, and dominance. Energy drink brands achieved significantly higher TMI scores (M = 36.5/40) than personal care brands (M = 23.5/40), reflecting deliberate strategic differences in how masculinity is visually packaged across product categories. From these patterns, four typological categories emerged: dominant masculinity typography, aggressive masculinity typography, heroic masculinity typography, and modern masculinity typography. Overall, these findings support the argument that typography is not a neutral vessel for verbal content, but rather an active participant in the cultural production of gendered identities.