Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Propaganda Putih Kampanye Moderasi Beragama Menggunakan Hashtag di Media Sosial X Arif Budiwinarto; Mochamad Syaefudin
Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika dan Komunikasi Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Juli: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Informatika dan Komunikasi
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/juitik.v5i2.1046

Abstract

The advancement of information technology has significantly transformed how people communicate and share information, including within religious contexts. Social media platforms, particularly Twitter/X, have emerged as strategic channels for disseminating religious messages one of which is through the use of hashtags (#), which enable categorization and wider dissemination of content. Amid Indonesia's diverse society, religious moderation has become an urgent need to mitigate potential interfaith conflicts. This study aims to examine how "white propaganda" is utilized in digital campaigns promoting the principles of religious moderation by government institutions and religious organizations. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, this research collects data through documentation and literature review. The findings are expected to illustrate forms of digital communication strategies—specifically white propaganda—that effectively disseminate the values of tolerance, balance, and justice in religious practice. Furthermore, the study contributes to the development of communication science, particularly in the domains of digital communication and religious social campaigns.
Legal Adaptation for Muslim Minorities: A Reconstruction of Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat through the Methodological Frameworks of Abdullah bin Bayyah and Muhammad Yusri Ibrahim Solikin, Nur; Syaiful Ahyar; Muhamad Zaenal Muttaqin; Mochamad Syaefudin; Hilmi Ridho
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 11 No 1 (2026): In Press
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v11i1.13028

Abstract

This article examines the reconstruction of fiqh al-aqalliyyat as a framework for legal adaptation addressing the complex socio-legal challenges faced by Muslim minorities in non-Muslim majority societies. It focuses on the methodological frameworks developed by Abdullah bin Bayyah and Muhammad Yusri Ibrahim, two prominent contemporary scholars whose works have significantly shaped minority jurisprudence. Employing a comparative doctrinal and analytical approach, this study examines their primary writings sinaʿat al-Fatwa wa Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat and Fiqh al-Nawazil li al-Aqalliyyat al-Muslimah to identify the epistemological foundations, legal reasoning patterns, and normative objectives underlying their approaches. The findings demonstrate a clear methodological divergence: Ibn Bayyah emphasizes maqāṣid al-shariʿah, tahqiq al-manat, and contextual legal reasoning rooted in the Maliki tradition to enable adaptive and purpose-oriented rulings, while Yusri Ibrahim adopts a more textualist and precedent-based framework within the Hanbali school, prioritizing juristic continuity and doctrinal restraint. This article argues that fiqh al-aqalliyyat should be understood not merely as a collection of legal concessions (rukhaṣ), but as a systematic methodological paradigm that negotiates normative fidelity and contextual responsiveness. By reframing minority fiqh through the lens of legal adaptation, this study contributes to contemporary debates on Islamic legal methodology, minority rights, and the future development of Islamic jurisprudence in pluralistic societies.