Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia
Linora, Linora
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Isu Kritis Pembelajaran Anak Sekolah Dasar Widiastuti, Widiastuti; Linora, Linora; Hendrizal, Hendrizal
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Volume 3 No 3
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jpion.v3i3.298

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine critical issues in elementary school children's learning. Several factors that could be the cause of not maximizing student achievement or enthusiasm for elementary school students' learning include: too abstract teaching materials,less interesting delivery by an educator, less active students, less optimal media used as teaching materials, or less precise models. learning.This research uses a qualitative approach. The results of the research show that elementary school children's learning includes: 1)Interactive and fun learning, effective learning is characterized by an ongoing teaching and learning process that is able to teach students and obtain satisfactory learning achievements 2) Linking material with everyday life, paying attention to student activities in learning that is able to train students to relate learning concepts to real life situations 3) Using interactive media technology, the low quality of educational facilities and infrastructure can be caused by various factors, such as hampered distribution of funds, misuse of school funds, poor maintenance of facilities and infrastructure,supervision of school officials who are indifferent to facilities and infrastructure, and other factors,4)providing rewards. Rewards in learning are that students will receive awards after learning well and following the rules given by the teacher and school.
Menganalisis Pemilihan Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Widiastuti, Widiastuti; Linora, Linora; Hidayat , Hafiz
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): Volume 3 No 3
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/jpion.v3i3.299

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the selection of educational program evaluation models. This research uses a qualitative approach. The research results show that the Scriven Model Scriven designed two evaluation models, namely: (1) Goal-Free Evaluation Approach, and (b) Formative and Summative model, 2) Contenance Evaluation Model (Stake Model). The program evaluation model introduced by Stake is known as the Countenance (overall) model. 3) Alkin Model. Limitations of the evaluation construct as a process of determining the area to be evaluated. 4) CSE-UCLA Evaluation Model. The steps of the CSE-UCLA model are divided into four stages, namely: needs assessment, program planning, formative evaluation, and summative evaluation. 5) Discrepancy Model. The steps in this gap model are: preparation of design, installation, process, d) Measuring the goal (product), e) comparison (program comparison), 6) Brinkerhoff et-al's model consists of: (1) fixed vs emergent evaluation design, (2) formative vs summative evaluation, and (3) experimental and quasi experimental design vs natural/unobtrusive inquiry.
Co-Authors Hendrizal Hendrizal Hidayat , Hafiz WIDIASTUTI -