Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi
Makatita, Welhelmina Vince
Unknown Affiliation
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Education Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
INTEGRASI MODEL HOUSE OF RISK DAN ANALYTICAL NETWORKING PROCESS (ANP) UNTUK MITIGASI RISIKO SUPPLY CHAIN Natalia, Christine; Oktavia, Chendrasari Wahyu; Makatita, Welhelmina Vince; Suprata, Ferdian
Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Vol. 22 No. 01 (2021): Juni
Publisher : Prodi Teknik Industri, Fakultas Teknik - Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/metris.v22i01.2619

Abstract

Currently, the resilience of the company is not separated from the strength supply chain network. Without this network, so the business process will not run well. But the strong supply chain network became vulnerable to risk. It caused by complexity and a highly dependent supply chain network. These risks need to minimize. The method that can be used to minimize risk with integrating the house of risk method and Analytical Network Process. The purpose of these integration methods to identification and recognized interrelationships between risk agent’s mitigation strategies, so the effect of event risk can be reduced. And then, by looking strategies can reducing costs incurred by the company and efficiency of risk agent’s mitigation strategy. Based on the results of House of Risk stage 1, there are 25 causes of risk that need to mitigate. The risk mitigation strategies that obtained to minimize the causes of risk, are then processed by the Analytical Networking Process (ANP) method. Based on the results of the Analytical Networking Process (ANP) method, there are two risk mitigation strategies. House of Risk stage 2 has applied to measure the efficiency and the level of difficulty of these two risk mitigation strategies. The results showed that the best mitigation strategies are conducting training and measuring company’s performance.
Co-Authors Chendrasari Wahyu Oktavia Christine Natalia Ferdian Suprata