Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan
Alifia, Dhania
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN.Brb) Abdullah, Muhammad Zen; Alamsyah, Bunyamin; Alifia, Dhania
Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum Vol 15, No 2 (2023): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/legalitas.v15i2.518

Abstract

Various criminal acts that occur in people's lives, one of which is the crime of theft which has recently been widespread and has increased in the mass media reports and electronic media. The crime of theft is really very disturbing security, order, welfare and greatly causes material and immaterial losses to the community. Therefore, it is necessary to immediately anticipate and deal with it by responding quickly and appropriately to its resolution through the applicable legal mechanism, by punishing the perpetrator/suspect with a sufficiently aggravated criminal threat, so that the crime of theft in question can be suppressed and minimized. In the court examination process in the application of criminal sanctions against the crime of theft in a burdensome situation by a child based on case Number 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN. Brb, the problems were; a. What is the basis for the judge's legal considerations in passing a criminal decision against the crime of theft in a burdensome situation by a child and b. How is the content/order of the judge's decision against the crime of theft in a burdensome situation by a child. To answer the problem formulation listed above, the theory of sentencing, the theory of judges' legal considerations and the theory of law enforcement are used. This research is normative juridical and empirical juridical research. The type of data included primary and secondary law materials. Technique of collecting legal sources used was library study/document study on literature, legislation, and document, and also interview. From the results of the study, reflected in the basis of the judge's legal considerations in passing a criminal decision against the crime of theft in a burdensome situation by a child firearms against the defendant, with the decision to sentence the defendant to 4 (four) months, based on the decision of the case Number 2/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/ PN.Brb. Whereas in Article 363 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code which is violated the maximum penalty is 9 (nine) years. So it is felt that the application of the criminal decision is still very light and not optimal. The suggestion put forward is that the maximum sanctions should be given specifically to children who have repeatedly committed similar crimes as long as they are in accordance with the applicable legal provisions.
ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI ANAK SEBAGAI KORBAN KEKERASAN AYAH KANDUNG (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 242/PID.SUS/2015/PN.PDG) Alifia, Dhania; Budyatmojo, Winarno
Recidive : Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan Vol 7, No 1 (2018): APRIL
Publisher : Criminal Law Section Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/recidive.v7i1.40576

Abstract

AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum bagi anak sebagai korban tindak pidana kekerasan oleh ayah kandungnya dalam Putusan Nomor 242/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Pdg. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum doktrinal atau penelitian hukum normatif. Bahan hukum yang digunakan dalam penulisan hukum ini adalah bahan hukum primer berupa Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak dan peraturan perundang-undangan lain yang berkaitan dengan perlindungan anak sebagai korban, dan juga bahan hukum sekunder yang berupa jurnal, buku-buku, dan berbagai literatur. Penelitian ini bersifat preskriptif, yang memberikan argumentasi atas hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan terkait dengan perlindungan hukum bagi anak sebagai korban kekerasan ayah kandung. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan kasus. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini berupa studi kepustakaan dan teknik analisis data yang digunakan bersifat deduksi dengan metode silogisme. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia telah mengatur berbagai hal terkait perlindungan bagi anak sebagai korban. Namun dalam Putusan Nomor 242/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Pdg, hakim nampak kurang memperhatikan aspek perlindungan bagi anak sebagai korban karena dalam putusan hakim tidak menjatuhkan pemberatan pidana kepada pelaku sebagaimana yang diperintahkan oleh Undang-Undang dan tidak ada penetapan restitusi.Kata kunci: Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga, Anak sebagai Korban, Perlindungan AnakAbstractThe aim of this research is to know the legal protection for children who are the victims of abuse by his father in the verdict number 242/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Pdg. This study is a doctrinal law or normative legal research. Legal materials that used in this legal writing is a primary legal material such as child protection laws and other legislation that relating to the protection of children as victims, and also secondary legal materials, such as journals, books, and other literatures. This research provides the argumentation based on the research result about the legal protection for children who are victims of abusement by his father. The statte approach and case approach are used in this study. This research used literature review tecnique of data collection and deductive syllogism tecnique of data analysis. Based on the results of research and discussion, many legislation in Indonesia has been set various things that related to legal protection for children as victim. But, in the verdict number 242/Pid.Sus/2015/ PN/Pdg, the judge appears not pay to attention to aspects of child legal protection as a victim because in the verdict, the judge did not impose criminal weighting for perpetrators and there’s no restitution.Keywords: Domestic Violence, Child as Victims, Child Protection
Co-Authors Abdullah, Muhammad Zen Bunyamin Alamsyah, Bunyamin Winarno Budyatmojo