Kartanegara, Rd. Mulyadhi
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Telaah Kritis terhadap Epistemologi Barat Kartanegara, Rd. Mulyadhi
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 1 No. 3 (1999): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v1i3.14301

Abstract

The fundamental difference between modern scientific theory and Islam, particularly in scope and methodology, lies in their fundamental perspectives. My hope is for modern Muslim intellectuals to realize that the modern scientific worldview is not the only universal perspective. There exist other scholarly perspectives developed by classical Muslim scholars—and indeed scholars of other religions—that could be considered as alternatives, potentially more suitable for our culturally religious atmosphere.
Metodologi Kajian Filsafat Islam Kartanegara, Rd. Mulyadhi
Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Filsafat Vol. 1 No. 1 (1998): Refleksi
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/ref.v1i1.39115

Abstract

The methods used in a study significantly determine the results and quality of that study. The better and more appropriate the methods used, the more optimal the quality and results of our research. This writing will discuss four points related to the methodology of philosophical studies in general, and Islamic philosophy in particular. First, it relates to the method of understanding a text, or what is commonly known as the hermeneutic method. Second, it concerns understanding a philosophical idea not as a final product but as a process. Third, it pertains to curriculum development that includes lesser-known but very important figures as links in the development of philosophical ideas, or what is commonly referred to as minor philosophers and also Muslim scientists. Fourth, it relates to the method of analysis or presentation from descriptive to critical methods.
Konsep Kebahagiaan (Analisis Perbandingan Ibnu Miskawaih dan John Stuart Mill) Alfarizi, Muhammad; Kartanegara, Rd. Mulyadhi
Paradigma: Jurnal Kalam dan Filsafat Vol. 5 No. 02 (2023): Paradigma: Jurnal Kalam dan Filsafat
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/paradigma.v5i02.33712

Abstract

Abstrak: Kebahagiaan merupakan sebuah cita yang sangat diinginkan oleh setiap manusia. Karena pada dasarnya manusia ingin hidup bahagia. Akan tetapi banyak sekali perbedaan pendapat mengenai kebahagiaan. Diantaranya adalah Ibnu Miskawaih dan John Stuart Mill. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji makna konsep kebahagiaan menurut Ibnu Miskwaih dan John Stuart Mill serta menjelaskan perbandingan dari konsep keduanya. Penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian kepustakaan (Library research). Sumber-sumber data diperoleh dari sumber primer dan sekunder yang berkaitan dengan konsep kebahagiaan Ibnu Miskawaih dan John Stuart Mill. Adapun penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode deskriptif-komparatif. Mengenai konsep kebahagiaan Ibnu Miskawaih mengatakan bahwa seseorang yang telah mencapai kebahagiaan tidak akan membutuhkan hal lainnya. Menurutnya, tindakan yang berbentuk sebuah kebaikan adalah proses menuju kebahagiaan. akan tetapi, Ibnu Miskawaih meyakini bahwa kebahagiaan sempurna akan sulit dirasakan oleh manusia jika manusia belum terlepas dari jasad dan kepentingannya di dunia, Sedangkan Mill memiliki pandangannya sendiri mengenai kebahagiaan. Menurutnya, seberapa berfungsi dan bergunanya sebuah tindakan seseorang untuk orang lain adalah tolak ukur untuk melihat seberapa besar tingkat kebahagiaan yang akan dirasakan oleh orang tersebut. Dari hasil penelitian yang didapat, Penulis menemukan adanya perbedaan dan persamaan terkait konsep kebahagiaan kedua tokoh. Perbandingan tersebut dapat ditemukan dalam pemahaman kedua tokoh mengenai konsep dan makna kebahagiaan yang didasari oleh latar belakang intelektual, agama, dan budaya.  Kata Kunci: Kebahagiaan, Aristoteles, John Stuart Mill, Ibnu Miskawaih. Abstract: Happiness is a desire that is deeply sought after by every human being. Because fundamentally, humans want to live happily. However, there are many differing opinions about happiness. Among them are Ibn Miskawaih and John Stuart Mill. This research aims to examine the meaning of the concept of happiness according to Ibn Miskawaih and John Stuart Mill, as well as to explain the comparison between their concepts. This research is a type of literature review. (Library research). Data sources were obtained from primary and secondary sources related to the concept of happiness according to Ibn Miskawaih and John Stuart Mill. This research was conducted using a descriptive-comparative method. Regarding the concept of happiness, Ibn Miskawaih stated that a person who has attained happiness will not need anything else. According to him, actions that take the form of goodness are a process towards happiness. However, Ibn Miskawaih believes that perfect happiness will be difficult for humans to experience if they have not yet freed themselves from the body and its worldly interests, while Mill has his own perspective on happiness. According to him, the extent to which a person's actions are functional and beneficial for others is a measure of how much happiness that person will experience. From the research findings, the author discovered differences and similarities regarding the concept of happiness between the two figures. This comparison can be found in the understanding of both figures about the concept and meaning of happiness, which is based on their intellectual, religious, and cultural backgrounds. Keywords: Happiness, Aristoteles, John Stuart Mill, Ibnu Miskawaih