Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pertanggungjawaban Perdata atas Penyalahgunaan Teknologi Deepfake dalam Perspektif Hukum Indonesia Yanuafriza, Andyva Yudhistira; Eluan, Flavio Valerie
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Teknologi deepfake adalah teknik sintesis media yang menggunakan kecerdasan buatan untuk membuat pemalsuan yang realistis dan sulit dibedakan dari aslinya. Penyalahgunaan deepfake semakin marak dengan jumlah pengguna yang terus bertambah dimana hal ini menimbulkan bermacam penyebaran berita hoax, penyalahgunaan data pribadi, dan penipuan, maka hal ini menunjukkan bahwa penting bagi hukum perdata untuk mengatur pertanggungjawaban perdatanya. Hukum positif di Indonesia, khususnya hukum perdata belum mengatur tentang pertanggungjawaban perdata penyalahgunaan teknologi deepfake sehingga terjadi kekosongan hukum. Metode penelitian dalam penulisan ini menggunakan analisis deskriptif dengan yuridis normatif sebagai pendekatan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan mendeskripsikan pertanggungjawaban perdata atas penyalahgunaan teknologi deepfake ditinjau dari hukum positif di Indonesia. Sumber data yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer yakni Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Bahan hukum sekunder berupa studi kepustakaan terkait dengan bahan-bahan hukum tentang pertanggungjawaban perdata, teknologi deepfake dan penyalahgunaannya. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis mengenai pertanggungjawaban perdata dalam konteks penyalahgunaan teknologi deepfake. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyalahgunaan teknologi deepfake yang menghasilkan konten dengan informasi palsu, merupakan tindakan perbuatan melawan hukum yang diatur dalam Pasal 1365 KUHPerdata
Misappropriation of Parking Operators’ Responsibilities in Commercial Parking Zones Eluan, Flavio Valerie
Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science (Octob
Publisher : Dinasti Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/dijemss.v7i1.5244

Abstract

The dense commercial areas that have sprung up around communities have led to the proliferation of commercial parking areas, which are intended to help consumers or customers who come to visit by tidying up their vehicles so that they are more organized and secure when left by consumers to shop or carry out activities in the commercial area. However, commercial parking areas often display signs stating, “We are not responsible for any losses,” which creates ambiguity regarding the parking management's responsibility, as if they are not involved in any losses experienced by consumers. This study aims to identify the limits of responsibility that should be borne by parking lot managers and to provide consumer protection. This study uses normative research with a deductive syllogism method based on the major premise, followed by the minor premise, and then both premises are drawn into a conclusion. A syllogism consists of two premises (major and minor) and one conclusion. The major premise is that commercial parking area managers are obligated to protect consumers' belongings or vehicles from any form of theft or other losses experienced by visitors. while the minor premise lies in the ambiguity of the statement “Any form of loss is not our responsibility,” which is clearly irrelevant to use as it would harm visitors or consumers and absolve the parking area operator of responsibility in the commercial area.