Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pemilu dalam Perspektif Hadis Riwayat Al-Bukhari Mengenai Larangan Memilih Pemimpin yang Tidak Kompeten Rayhan Nadindra Alfatih; Tajul Arifin
JURNAL RISET RUMPUN ILMU PENDIDIKAN Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Agustus : JURRIPEN : Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurripen.v4i2.5803

Abstract

This study aims to examine the Islamic perspective on the process of electing leaders, focusing on the hadith narrated by Al-Bukhari that warns of the dangers of entrusting authority to those who are not qualified. Using a descriptive-analytical method with a normative juridical approach, this research analyzes primary sources such as the hadiths in Sahih Al-Bukhari and relevant statutory regulations, supported by secondary sources from related scholarly literature. The findings reveal that leadership in Islam is a great trust (amanah) that demands strict fulfillment of Shari'ah criteria, including justice, trustworthiness, knowledge, and honesty. Entrusting leadership to incompetent individuals may lead to widespread social and political collapse, as indicated by the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) in his hadith. Furthermore, the community’s negligence in electing suitable leaders is considered a collective sin that significantly affects societal stability. Therefore, Muslims must exercise greater vigilance, critical thinking, and responsibility in choosing their leaders to maintain social order in line with the principles of shura and Islamic values.
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia Naufal Raka Maulana; Rayhan Nadindra Alfatih; Tutur Nurul Hidayatulloh; Ahyana Ikhwana Ramadhana; Muhammad Luthfi Al Farizi; Rafy Muhammad Fathsa; Ghiffaridz Valdzan Arrazi; Nandang Najmudin
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v3i2.3255

Abstract

The e-commerce is a familiar acronym to lots of apparently active internet explorers. E-commerce has been responsible for the improvements factors of this era of which we know at the very moment as well as its disputes and the solvings following it. The concrete and true step is supposed to be taken by law, in a proper, recognized way of conduct. This research focuses mainly on studying the Online Dispute Resolutions (ODR), including its various definitions, regulations, and how entire dispute is solved at the end from this. This research uses the qualitative method with descriptive-analysis approach. With the correct perspective and proper navigations, ODR is, undoubtfully, able to regulate and organize most, if not all, the e-commerce disputes handlings. At the end of the day, ODR is the perfect method of how we could solely finish disputes with proper, efficient, yet uniquely imperfect method of non-litigation way of any case related to breach of contract. Through ODR, parties are able to fairly balance their needs to operate and function to handle their any case thoroughly thus it has been proven, by this research, to be a fair legal way to solve disputes involving any person.