Masdiah, Auliya Hanidatul
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Influence of the Constitutional Court Ruling No 90/PUU-XXI/2023 on the Authority and Marvel of the Constitutional Court as Guardian of the Constitution Masdiah, Auliya Hanidatul; Kristanto, Budi
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 6 No 2 (2024): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v6i2.1161

Abstract

The Constitutional Court was formed to maintain the integrity of the Constitution through a deeper interpretation based on the 1945 Constitution. This journal discusses the influence of CC Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 on the Authority and Dignity of the Constitutional Court as Guardian of the Constitution. The study combines a literature review methodology with a qualitative approach. The research results show that CC Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023 is contrary to the Constitutional Court's authority based on the 1945 Constitution. The addition of new regulations that were previously unregulated or not is not outside the Constitutional Court's jurisdiction, but rather the legislative authority. Research examines the importance of maintaining judicial neutrality to prevent abuse of power. The Constitutional Court, as the Guardian of the Constitution, must pay attention to the rights of citizens and maintain the balance of power. With this controversial decision, in the context of the CC authority which should be limited to constitutional review and maintaining the neutral role of the judiciary in fighting abuse of power by the legislature and executive. Even though the Constitutional Court is the final decision maker on laws based on the 1945 Constitution, its authority is limited to reviewing laws and is not involved in the legislative realm.
DPRD Recess Fund Regulation and Government Governance Problems: A Literature Study on Policy Effectiveness and Its Challenges Masdiah, Auliya Hanidatul; Sopiana, Yunita; Arisanty, Deasy
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 8 No 1 (2026): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v8i1.1600

Abstract

The DPRD recess fund is an important instrument for strengthening political representation and accommodating public aspirations. However, its effectiveness is highly dependent on the quality of regulation and the implementation of good governance principles. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing DPRD recess funds, examine governance-related problems in their implementation, and assess their effectiveness in enhancing political representation and accountability. This research employs a qualitative method with a literature study approach, utilizing secondary data obtained from laws and regulations, books, and scholarly journals. The findings indicate that the implementation of DPRD recess activities has not fully reflected good governance principles, as evidenced by low public participation, weak transparency and accountability, and suboptimal responsiveness of DPRD members in following up on public aspirations. Furthermore, existing regulations still contain weaknesses in regulating fund utilization and sanctions, which create opportunities for misuse.