Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Ergative and Antipassive Construction in Minangkabaunese: Are There? Jufrizal, Jufrizal; Lely Refnita; M. Affandi Arianto
Linguistik Indonesia Vol. 42 No. 1 (2024): Linguistik Indonesia
Publisher : Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26499/li.v42i1.585

Abstract

That Minangkabunese has active-passive dichotomy is not questioned anymore since it has been treated as an accusative language. Further typological analysis toward grammatical constructions of this language leads to a claim that it may be treated as an ergative language in which the ergative and antipassive constructions exist. That Minangkabaunese has ergative and antipassive construction is still questioned in some matters. Therefore, further grammatical-typological data, analysis, and discussion are needed. This paper, which is based on and developed from a part of results of research conducted in 2021-2022, particularly analyses whether Minangkabaunese has ergative and/or antipassive constructions. Two questions are raised, namely: (i) are there ergative and antipassive constructions in Minangkabaunese? and (ii) what is the linguistic implication of such claim toward grammatical typology of Minangkabaunese? This descriptive-qualitative study was practically operated as a linguistic field research and supported by a library study. Native speakers as represented by selected informants and written texts of Minangkabaunese were the sources of data. The data are in the form of clause constructions of Minangkabunese identified as the standard ones and were analyzed based on related theories of grammatical typology. The result of data analysis reveals that Minangkabaunese has ergative and antipassive constructions. Implicationally, this language may be typologically treated as an ergative language at the syntactic level beside as an accusative language.
Karakteristik Umpan Balik Tutor dalam Penulisan Cerita Anak Dewi Syafrina; M. Affandi Arianto
Journal of Education Language and Innovation Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): In Press
Publisher : Indonesian and Regional Language and Literature Department, Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/jeli.v3i2.66

Abstract

Pemberian umpan balik tidak hanya dibutuhkan oleh siswa dalam menghasilkan tulisan yang berkualitas, tetapi juga dibutuhkan oleh penulis. Dalam hal ini tutor memiliki peran penting dalam proses menulis seorang penulis. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi umpan balik tutor dalam proses menulis cerita anak. Karakteristik umpan balik tutor yang dikomentari tutor akan dianalisis. Satu penulis cerita anak berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Penulis menghasilkan lima cerita dengan jumlah draf yang berbeda untuk setiap cerita. Data yang dikumpulkan adalah feedback tutor yang bersumber dari draf cerita anak yang sudah dikomentari tutor. Data dianalisis menggunakan kategori feedback (Park, 2018) yang terdiri atas Clarification, Identification, Explanation, Suggestion, dan Appreciation. Penelitian ini menemukan satu kategori tambahan, yaitu Question. Sementara itu, Suggestion adalah kategori umpan balik yang sering muncul dalam umpan balik tutor. Dari penelitian ini diketahui bahwa pemberian umpan balik tidak hanya dibutuhkan di dalam kelas, tetapi juga bagi penulis di luar lingkungan kelas. Tutor dapat memberikan umpan balik yang bervariasi, termasuk memberikan apresiasi lebih sering untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan diri penulis.