Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

THE ESSENCE OF HUMAN BEINGS IN THE TAFSIR MAQĀL FI AL-INSĀN DIRĀSAH QUR’ĀNIYYAH BY BINT AL-SYATHI Mutawakkil Faqih
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Human being based on the term of insān is explained by mufassir as highly variable, there is a tendency on the side of human weakness in sexual passion, worldly pleasure aspect and directs its interpretation of the physical / body.The authors were interested in studying human nature human studies in the interpretation of Maqāl Fi al-Insān Dirāsah Qurāniyyah by Bintu al-Syāthī. The problems as follows, how methods, patterns and systematic interpretation and how does human nature by Bintu al-Syāthī perspective. According to Bintu al-Syāthī, the nature of human being in the Holy Qur’an. (a) Al-basyar is the sense of human being in material dimension, (b) Al-ins have meaning denoting kindness as opposed to savagery. (c) Al-Insān tends to interpretation the meaning of human being by the spiritual and social aspect.(d) Al-Nās for the descendants of Adam who showed human diversity and characteristics.
COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL AND MODERN INTERPRETATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE QUR'AN Kgs M. Choirul Muchlis; Mutawakkil Faqih; Pathur Rahman; Abdur Rahman Nor Afif Hamid; Nanang Lidwan
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the comparison between classical and modern exegetical approaches within the Qur’anic interpretive tradition. Classical tafsir is primarily rooted in authoritative narrations through tafsir bi al-ma’tsur and tafsir bi al-ra’yi, emphasizing chains of transmission, linguistic analysis, and the views of early Muslim scholars. In contrast, modern tafsir emerged in response to socio-political and intellectual changes in the 19th and 20th centuries, with figures such as Muhammad Abduh and Rashid Rida leading the movement. Modern exegetical approaches highlight contextual, thematic, and maqashid-based interpretations aimed at addressing contemporary societal challenges, including social issues, scientific developments, and humanistic concerns. This study concludes that the primary distinction between these approaches lies in their interpretive orientation: classical tafsir is textual and traditional, whereas modern tafsir is rational, dynamic, and attuned to the realities of modern life. Nevertheless, both approaches contribute significantly to the evolving epistemology of Qur’anic interpretation and collectively enrich the understanding of the Qur’an’s universal message.
WOMEN'S ECONOMIC RIGHTS IN THE QUR'AN QURAISH SHIHAB'S PERSPECTIVE IN TAFSIR AL-MISBAH Syifaul Alami; Fatihunnada F.; Hasan Basri Salim; Nanang Lidwan; Mutawakkil Faqih; Sudiyo
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58487/akrabjuara.v11i2.2793

Abstract

In the study of Islamic exegesis, the issue of gender equality—particularly regarding women's economic rights—often receives insufficient attention. Most traditional interpretations tend to uphold patriarchal views that limit women's roles in the economic sphere. Using a library research method, this study finds that Quraish Shihab's approach differs from traditional interpretations, which tend to be literal and ignore the socio-cultural context of the time. Through his moderate and contextual approach, Quraish Shihab allows for a reinterpretation of Qur'anic verses so they remain relevant to contemporary developments. This enables the application of just and inclusive Islamic values ​​across various aspects of life, including in the economic domain. His interpretation does not advocate for absolute equality but rather aligns rights and responsibilities according to individual capacities, making it more relevant to modern social dynamics. The findings show that Islam provides space for women to participate in economic activities, own property, work, and manage assets independently, while upholding the principle of justice rather than absolute equality. Therefore, women's economic rights must be recognized and protected in accordance with their capacities and responsibilities.