Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
Mutawakkil Faqih
Unknown Affiliation
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Medicine & Pharmacology

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
THE ESSENCE OF HUMAN BEINGS IN THE TAFSIR MAQĀL FI AL-INSĀN DIRĀSAH QUR’ĀNIYYAH BY BINT AL-SYATHI Mutawakkil Faqih
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Human being based on the term of insān is explained by mufassir as highly variable, there is a tendency on the side of human weakness in sexual passion, worldly pleasure aspect and directs its interpretation of the physical / body.The authors were interested in studying human nature human studies in the interpretation of Maqāl Fi al-Insān Dirāsah Qurāniyyah by Bintu al-Syāthī. The problems as follows, how methods, patterns and systematic interpretation and how does human nature by Bintu al-Syāthī perspective. According to Bintu al-Syāthī, the nature of human being in the Holy Qur’an. (a) Al-basyar is the sense of human being in material dimension, (b) Al-ins have meaning denoting kindness as opposed to savagery. (c) Al-Insān tends to interpretation the meaning of human being by the spiritual and social aspect.(d) Al-Nās for the descendants of Adam who showed human diversity and characteristics.
COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL AND MODERN INTERPRETATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE QUR'AN Kgs M. Choirul Muchlis; Mutawakkil Faqih; Pathur Rahman; Abdur Rahman Nor Afif Hamid; Nanang Lidwan
Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Yayasan Azam Kemajuan Rantau Anak Bengkalis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the comparison between classical and modern exegetical approaches within the Qur’anic interpretive tradition. Classical tafsir is primarily rooted in authoritative narrations through tafsir bi al-ma’tsur and tafsir bi al-ra’yi, emphasizing chains of transmission, linguistic analysis, and the views of early Muslim scholars. In contrast, modern tafsir emerged in response to socio-political and intellectual changes in the 19th and 20th centuries, with figures such as Muhammad Abduh and Rashid Rida leading the movement. Modern exegetical approaches highlight contextual, thematic, and maqashid-based interpretations aimed at addressing contemporary societal challenges, including social issues, scientific developments, and humanistic concerns. This study concludes that the primary distinction between these approaches lies in their interpretive orientation: classical tafsir is textual and traditional, whereas modern tafsir is rational, dynamic, and attuned to the realities of modern life. Nevertheless, both approaches contribute significantly to the evolving epistemology of Qur’anic interpretation and collectively enrich the understanding of the Qur’an’s universal message.
Co-Authors Abdur Rahman Nor Afif Hamid Kgs M. Choirul Muchlis Lidwan, Nanang Pathur Rahman