Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Mavisha: Law And Society Journal
Irwanda, Tasya Gita
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Konkuren Terkait Wanprestasi Debitor Dalam Pembatalan Perdamaian Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Irwanda, Tasya Gita; Seliam, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah
Mavisha: Law and Society Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Legal Community Associations

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/zv6xh388

Abstract

This research uses normative research methods with qualitative research types because it focuses on legislation. This research uses a statutory approach (statue approach) and case approach. The results of this study indicate that legal protection for concurrent creditors has been achieved, which is indicated by the consideration of the judge's decision in granting the application for cancellation of concurrent creditor peace so that Decision Number 25/Pdt.Sus-Cancellation of Peace/2022/PN Niaga.Jkt.Pst is officially canceled and the debtor is bankrupt. The panel of judges in deciding the case certainly considers the rights of concurrent creditors contained in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU so that by achieving legal certainty, it simultaneously guarantees that Law Number 37 of 2004 also provides legal protection to concurrent creditors   Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan jenis penelitian kualitatif karena berfokus pada peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statue approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa perlindungan hukum bagi kreditor konkuren telah tercapai yang ditandai dengan pertimbangan putusan hakim dalam mengabulkan permohonan pembatalan perdamaian kreditor konkuren sehingga Putusan Nomor 25/Pdt.Sus-Pembatalan Perdamaian/2022/PN Niaga.Jkt.Pst resmi dibatalkan dan debitor pailit. Majelis hakim dalam memutuskan perkara tentunya mempertimbangkan hak-hak kreditor konkuren yang terdapat pada Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU sehingga dengan tercapainya kepastian hukum tersebut maka sekaligus menjamin bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 juga memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap kreditor konkuren.
Rechtvinding Dalam Sengketa Perdata: Analisis Metode Penemuan Hukum Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 46/K/Pdt/2006 Irwanda, Tasya Gita; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17919982

Abstract

This study analyzes the forms and methods of legal discovery (rechtvinding) employed by the Supreme Court Justices in Decision No. 46/K/Pdt/2006, particularly in determining the existence of an unlawful act and assessing the legal reasoning that underlies the judgment. The analysis focuses on how the judges conducted interpretation, legal construction, and the application of legal principles to address gaps or ambiguities in the norms governing civil dispute resolution. Using a normative juridical research method with a case approach, this study finds that the judges applied a combination of systematic interpretation, teleological interpretation, and legal construction through the application of expanded legal principles as developed in jurisprudence. The judges not only applied Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code formally but also engaged in progressive legal discovery by assessing the substance of the defendant’s actions in light of the fundamental purpose of protecting the civil rights of the parties. The study demonstrates that the legal discovery performed in this decision reflects a shift from mere law application toward law creation oriented toward substantive justice. These findings are expected to contribute to the development of jurisprudential studies and civil adjudication practices in Indonesia, particularly concerning the formulation of the boundaries of unlawful acts through responsive and well-reasoned methods of legal discovery.
Teori dan Penemuan Hukum (Rechtsvinding) oleh Hakim Pada Tingkat Kasasi Terkait Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor: 796/Pid.B/2022/Pn.Jkt.Sel Vonis Mati yang Diubah Menjadi Penjara Seumur Hidup dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor: 813.K/Pid/2023) Adhitya, Muhammad Rendy; Alfatoni, Muhammad Sidiq; Irwanda, Tasya Gita; Raihani, Siti Rifqa; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17919252

Abstract

Pretrial proceedings (praperadilan) constitute an important innovation within the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) as an instrument for protecting the rights of suspects against arbitrary actions by law enforcement officials. However, since the Decision of the South Jakarta District Court Number 796/Pid.B/2022/PN.Jkt.Sel, the authority of pretrial proceedings has undergone significant development through the expansion of its objects to include the determination of suspects. This decision marks the occurrence of legal discovery (rechtsvinding) by the judge, who interpreted Article 77 of the KUHAP progressively based on the principles of human rights protection and the due process of law. This study aims to analyze the decision from the perspective of theories of justice, particularly Aristotle’s concept of justice. The method used is normative juridical analysis of judicial decisions and their legal reasoning. The results of the study indicate that the decision reflects retributive justice moving toward a more rehabilitative and humanistic approach. However, within the framework of distributive and corrective justice, debates arise concerning the proportionality of the punishment, the defendant’s position as a former high-ranking police official, and public expectations of justice. The decision is legally valid, yet it still leaves moral and ethical questions in its implementation.
Co-Authors Adhitya, Muhammad Rendy Alfatoni, Muhammad Sidiq Raihani, Siti Rifqa Seliam, Muhammad Ali Hanafiah Triadi, Irwan