Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought
Samanarnik, Samanarnik
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Contesting Misogyny in Canonical Hadith: A Comparative Analysis of the Commentaries of Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī and Badr al-Dīn al-‘Aynī on Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī Samanarnik, Samanarnik; Muhammad Saifullah; Muhammad Amiruddin
Journal of Ushuluddin and Islamic Thought Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): December
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/juit.2024.2.2.234-257

Abstract

This study examines the controversy surrounding authentic hadiths that reflect gender bias, misogyny, and anti-female sentiment, with a particular focus on Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, one of the most authoritative sources of Islamic law. Specifically, this study highlights how two major commentators on Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī, Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī and Badr al-Dīn al-‘Aynī, interpret hadiths that depict women as the majority of hell’s inhabitants and their understanding of the term kufr in that context, as explained in their major works, Fatḥ al-Bārī and ‘Umdat al-Qārī. This study also investigates the historical context of the two scholars, paying attention to their differing views and personal conflicts, as well as the impact of these on their interpretation of the hadith. Through a qualitative literature review approach, this study seeks to provide a deeper understanding of their methods of interpretation and highlights the presence of personal conflict as a factor shaping interpretive differences. This study argues that the competitive dynamics between Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī and Badr al-Dīn al-‘Aynī significantly influenced how each scholar understood this controversial narration, resulting in different readings of the hadith narrative that is often considered misogynistic.
Co-Authors Muhammad Amiruddin Muhammad Saifullah