Setiawan, Sania Nusantari
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Kerjasama Ekonomi China-Indonesia di Era Presiden Joko Widodo sebagai Instrumen Foreign Direct Investment China Setiawan, Sania Nusantari; Paksi, Arie Kusuma
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 6, No 4 (2024): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), May
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v6i4.2053

Abstract

This article analyzes economic cooperation between China and Indonesia during the era of President Joko Widodo's administration in the context of Foreign Direct Investment. In the investment sector, China occupies the top three positions together with Singapore and Hong Kong as countries with the largest levels of foreign investment in Indonesia. The focus of the research includes President Jokowi's economic policy towards FDI, forms of economic cooperation between the two countries and the socio-political impact of Chinese investment in Indonesia based on the benefit principle. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach by collecting data from various scientific literature, government policies and the latest press reports and analyzing it based on secondary data to describe the development of economic cooperation between China and Indonesia during the Joko Widodo government era. Joko Widodo's government has implemented economic policies to obtain capital. The One Stop Structured Service System and the “3 Hour Investment Permit” policy are significant steps. Even though there has been economic improvement, there are challenges from trade imbalances and investment problems, so regulatory policies are needed. This study concludes that Indonesia is able to improve its economy by contributing to establishing bilateral relations, as well as providing a positive impact on improving the quality of technology through Chinese FDI.
PUBLIC PERCEPTION OF STATE OFFICIAL ETHICS: A CASE STUDY OF THE POST-DEMAND OF AUGUST 2025 Setiawan, Sania Nusantari
JUPIIS: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ILMU-ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 17 No. 2 (2025): JUPIIS (JURNAL PENDIDIKAN ILMU-ILMU SOSIAL) DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/jupiis.v17i2.69401

Abstract

The ethics of state officials are a fundamental pillar in building and maintaining public trust, which serves as the foundation for the legitimacy and effectiveness of governance. In Indonesia, there is a gap between public expectations of officials' integrity and the reality of political practices, which are often tainted by abuse of power, corruption, collusion, nepotism (KKN), and the degradation of communication ethics. The massive demonstrations in August 2025 acted as a marker of the crisis, reflecting the public's deep disappointment with the behavior and policies of officials. The public perceives officials' ethics not merely as formal legal compliance but more as a manifestation of moral values, honesty, and civility in political life. This study employs a qualitative method with a case study approach to explore the public's subjective experiences in interpreting officials' ethics following the demonstrations. This study reveals a moral dissonance between public normative expectations and the actual behavior of officials. This experience shapes a negative collective memory while also triggering a new critical awareness to conduct more active social oversight. The research findings indicate that an ethical crisis not only damages individual reputations but also systemically undermines the legitimacy of government institutions. The study concludes that without comprehensive and ongoing ethical reform efforts, the erosion of public trust will continue, widening the gap between the state and its citizens. By addressing current issues, this research is expected to serve as material for critical reflection and provide practical recommendations for researchers and policymakers in efforts to strengthen the governance of integrity.