Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Instruments for Measuring Recovery among Serious Mental Illness: A Systematic Review of Systematic Review Thongsalab, Jutharat; Yunibhand, Jintana; Uthis, Penpaktr
Basic and Applied Nursing Research Journal Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Basic and Applied Nursing Research Journal (BANRJ)
Publisher : Future Science

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.11594/banrj.03.02.05

Abstract

Background: Indicators of recovery outcomes are selected by mental health nurses beginning with a commitment to a holistic and client-centered view of recovery. The purpose of the review aimed to bring together the results of previous systematic reviews on instruments for assessing the recovery of people with serious mental illnesses. Methods: A systematic literature review was carried out using the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute for systematic reviews. A literature search using The ScienceDirect, SpringerLink electronic databases, Google Scholar, and a Google search engine was used. Searching in literature published between January 2010 and December 2020, supplemented by reference tracking and Internet searches. The authors independently reviewed all titles, assessed articles’ eligibility for inclusion, determined a methodological quality score for each included article and extracted relevant data. Results: Out of 19,724 articles related to the title for potential inclusion in this review, four met the inclusion criteria. The eligibility tools appear to have been studied in various settings and with varied types of patients but are still congruent with SIM. Most importantly, the reviews identified several methodological limitations across the original studies. The lack of a ‘gold standard. This review found twenty-two dimensions in personal recovery instruments and twenty-one in mental health services orientation. Also, many recovery assessment tools are available for the serious mental illness population. However, there is limited evidence about their psychometric properties. Conclusion: Three instruments were found that could measure the personal recovery of people with serious mental illnesses. Those instruments' psychometric properties and cultural adaptation are recommended for further studies.
Predicting factors of aggression among Indonesian middle adolescents with conduct problems in the community: A correlational study Saputra, Fauzan; Uthis, Penpaktr; Suktrakul, Sunisa
Belitung Nursing Journal Vol. 11 No. 6 (2025): November - December
Publisher : Belitung Raya Publisher - Belitung Raya Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33546/bnj.4109

Abstract

Background: Middle adolescents with conduct problems (CP) are at higher risk for aggression than their peers. However, factors contributing to this phenomenon remain insufficiently understood, particularly in Indonesia. Objective: This study aimed to examine the direct and indirect relationships among parental monitoring, self-esteem, self-control, peer deviance, media violence exposure, academic self-concept, and aggression, using Problem Behavior Theory and supported literature review as a conceptual framework. Methods: A cross-sectional correlational design was employed. Data were collected from May to June 2023 from students aged 14 to 16 years with CP across nine junior high schools in Aceh Province, Indonesia. Instruments included the Parental Monitoring Instrument, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Brief Self-Control Scale, Deviant Peer Scale, Extended Content-Based Media Exposure Scale, Academic Self-Concept Questionnaire, and Aggression Problem Behavior Frequency Scale Adolescent Rating. Data were analyzed using path analysis with LISREL 8.80 and the Sobel test. Results: A total of 423 students participated in the study. Self-control and peer deviance were directly associated with aggression (z = -1.93, β = -0.19, and z = 2.41, β = 0.35, p <0.05, respectively). Self-esteem showed an indirect association with aggression, mediated by self-control (z = -1.783, β = -0.795, p = 0.038). Peer deviance mediated the effects of parental monitoring and media violence exposure on aggression (z = 2.126, β = 1.020, p = 0.017, and z = 2.14, β = 1.055, p = 0.017, respectively). The model explained 42 percent of the variance in aggression. Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of regular screening for conduct problems and aggression by community nurses and school-based counseling teachers, as well as the development of interventions focusing on peer deviance and self-control, which were identified as the most significant predictors of aggression.