Hayati, Munggarani Kusumah
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

The Use of The Group Investigation Type of Cooperative Learning Model When Online Learning to Increase Students' Learning Motivation Jamaluddin, Jamaluddin; Hayati, Munggarani Kusumah
Atthulab: Islamic Religion Teaching and Learning Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2022): Atthulab: Islamic Religion Teaching and Learning Journal
Publisher : Laboratory of Islamic Religious Education Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ath.v7i2.13713

Abstract

This study aims to determine the application of the Group Investigation Type cooperative learning model to the subjects of Islamic Religious Education and Character Education in seventh-grade students at SMPN 4 Cianjur through online learning. This study used a quasi-experimental method located at SMPN 4 Cianjur. The data collection tools used were observation, interviews, tests, questionnaires, and literature studies—quantitative data analysis with a statistical approach. The results of this study are: first, the application of the group investigation type cooperative learning model to PAI and Budi Pekerti subjects in class VII SMPN 4 Cianjur with online learning is included in the particular category as indicated by the acquisition of variable X of 4.20 which is included in the interval 4.20 to 5.00. Second, the learning motivation of class VII students at SMPN 4 Cianjur is high if online learning using the group investigation type cooperative learning model is included in the high category as indicated by the acquisition of the Y variable of 3.92, namely at intervals. From 3.40 to 4.19. Third, the application of the Group Investigation type of cooperative learning model in online learning has a relationship with an increase in student motivation of 0.83 with a strong category including the interval 0.80-1.00. The significant influence of variable X on variable Y can influence or contribute 68.9%, while other factors influence the remaining 31.11%.