Pakpahan, Dosni Ana Ragita
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Ketidakhadiran Prinsipal Dalam Persidangan Gugatan Sederhana Dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Proses Hukum Pakpahan, Dosni Ana Ragita; Rifai, Achmad
KEADILAN : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3 No 1 (2025): Maret
Publisher : Pengadilan Negeri Bale Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62565/keadilan.v3i1.88

Abstract

Ketidakhadiran prinsipal dalam persidangan gugatan sederhana menjadi permasalahan signifikan yang mempengaruhi kelancaran proses hukum di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi penyebab ketidakhadiran prinsipal serta menganalisis akibat hukumnya terhadap jalannya proses hukum, termasuk peran kuasa hukum dalam mendampingi prinsipal. Metode yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang mengkaji hukum dari perspektif internal dengan objek penelitian berupa norma hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam setiap persidangan gugatan sederhana, kedua belah pihak yaitu Penggugat dan Tergugat diwajibkan untuk hadir secara langsung dan tidak dapat diwakili oleh kuasa hukum sebab dalam gugatan sederhana, posisi pengacara tidak untuk "mewakili", melainkan hanya untuk "mendampingi" selama persidangan.
Reformulation of Cybercrime Regulations in The Misuse of Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia Pakpahan, Dosni Ana Ragita; Anis Widyawati
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Articles in press
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lrrq.v12i1.42659

Abstract

The rapid development of AI has increased the potential for cybercrime through increasingly sophisticated, automated, and wide-scale abuse methods. In Indonesia, the regulation of cybercrimes related to the abuse of AI is still fragmented and generally relies on general provisions on cybercrimes, so it does not fully accommodate the specific characteristics and risks of AI technology. This study aims to analyze the regulation of cybercrime in the abuse of AI in Indonesia, examine the regulatory approach applied in the European Union, and formulate a reformulation of cybercrime regulations in the misuse of artificial intelligence in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statute approach and a comparative approach conducted through literature studies. Primary legal materials include Indonesian and European Union laws and regulations, as well as other regulations, which are supported by secondary legal materials in the form of academic literature and official documents. The results of the study show that the applicable regulations in Indonesia have not provided adequate legal certainty and accountability mechanisms for AI-based cybercrimes. Instead, the EU implements a more structured and risk-based regulatory model. This study concludes that Indonesia needs to reformulate the regulation of cybercrime by explicitly integrating the risks of using AI, harmonizing laws and regulations, and strengthening institutional capacity to realize effective law enforcement in the digital era.