Yodo, Sutarman
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Legal Protection for Female workers in Indonesia (Study on the Rights of Female Workers in Tolitoli) Mulyadi, Mulyadi; Yodo, Sutarman; Sulbana, Sulbana
Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 18 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/fiatjustisia.v18no4.3598

Abstract

The lack of guarantees for female workers' rights remains a significant issue in Tolitoli Regency, encompassing concerns such as equal pay, decent work, maternity leave, childbirth and breastfeeding rights, social security, and protection against discrimination. This study, using a socio-legal approach with both qualitative and quantitative methods, finds that labor laws protecting female workers have not been fully implemented. Specifically, 90.2% of companies fail to provide maternity leave, and many others do not adhere to all relevant labor regulations. Key obstacles include limited awareness of rights, weak legal enforcement, and gender discrimination, along with a lack of employer responsibility. The study suggests that the Manpower Law can help create a more conducive environment for the protection of female workers' rights.
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN THE APPLICATION OF CRIMINAL ACTS THROUGH POLICE DISCRETION BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM Sugiharto, Widodo; Yodo, Sutarman; Sulbadana, Sulbadana
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4484

Abstract

This research aims to: (1) Understand and analyze the application of Discretion by the Police in resolving criminal acts. (2) Understand and analyze whether Police Discretion can be used as a basis for resolving criminal acts based on Restorative Justice. (3) Understand and analyze whether Local Wisdom values can strengthen Discretion in resolving criminal acts based on Restorative Justice. This research uses a normative-empirical research type. The use of this research type is based on the formulation of the problem proposed as a logical consequence of the research legal issue in the background of the problem. This research type is used in accordance with the formulation of the proposed problem. Research results: (1) The application of Discretion by the Police in resolving criminal acts. Criminal law enforcement with the authority of Police Discretion, in its implementation prioritizes the Restorative Justice approach, namely the resolution of criminal cases by involving the perpetrator, victim, perpetrator/victim's family and other related parties to jointly resolve fairly by emphasizing restoration to the original state. (2) Police Discretion can be used as a basis for resolving criminal acts based on Restorative Justice. Discretion based on the Restorative Justice approach is a paradigm that can be used as a framework for handling criminal cases through the conventional criminal justice system in Indonesia. Police Discretion based on Restorative Justice, handling criminal cases based on the National Police Chief Circular Number: SE/8/VII/2018 dated July 27, 2018 concerning the Application of Restorative Justice in the Settlement of Criminal Cases, which serves as a guideline for Investigators in resolving cases through Restorative Justice at the investigation and investigation level. (3) Local Wisdom values can strengthen Discretion in resolving criminal acts based on Restorative Justice. The revitalization of Local Wisdom is a strategy used to revive community traditions and culture so that they can be used as an alternative by the Police in resolving criminal acts. Through Restorative Justice originating from Police Discretion.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM DARI SUATU PUTUSAN ARBITRASE INTERNASIONAL DI INDONESIA Andrew Kindangen, Alvando; Yodo, Sutarman; Lanini, Agus
TADULAKO MASTER LAW JOURNAL Vol 9 No 2 (2025): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Tadulako

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper discusses the recognition and enforcement of international arbitral awards in Indonesia, which is constrained by existing laws and regulations. Although Indonesia has ratified the 1958 New York Convention and regulates international arbitration in Law No. 30 of 1999, the application of the principle of finality of arbitration is often hampered by broad interpretations of public order and procedures for the annulment of awards by courts. The resulting legal uncertainty reduces foreign investor confidence and creates obstacles to the enforcement of arbitral awards. This research suggests clearer legal reforms, limiting court intervention, and increasing the capacity of judges to understand international arbitration to ensure legal certainty and strengthen Indonesia's position as a jurisdiction that supports international arbitration. Penulisan ini membahas pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase internasional di Indonesia yang terkendala oleh peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada. Meskipun Indonesia telah meratifikasi Konvensi New York 1958 dan mengatur arbitrase internasional dalam Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999, penerapan prinsip finalitas arbitrase sering terhambat oleh interpretasi luas terhadap ketertiban umum dan prosedur pembatalan putusan oleh pengadilan. Ketidakpastian hukum yang timbul mengurangi kepercayaan investor asing dan menciptakan hambatan bagi pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase. Penelitian ini menyarankan reformasi hukum yang lebih jelas, pembatasan intervensi pengadilan, serta peningkatan kapasitas hakim dalam memahami arbitrase internasional untuk memastikan kepastian hukum dan memperkuat posisi Indonesia sebagai yurisdiksi yang mendukung arbitrase internasional.