<![CDATA[This article examines debates over visual depictions of the Prophet Muḥammad by reconnecting them to their canonical roots in al-Syamāʾil al-Muḥammadiyyah. Classical hadith sources especially al-Tirmiżī’s al-Syamāʾil al-Muḥammadiyyah, articulate detailed verbal portraits of the Prophet that function as an aniconic “verbal icon” within Islamic tradition. It addresses a scholarly gap in which studies of cartoons, memes, and films are often media-centered and seldom grounded in the hadith corpus that first articulated the Prophet’s physical attributes, leaving the link between canonical verbal portraits and modern visual translations underexplored. Methodologically, the article applies a reception-history approach (reception analysis) to three datasets: (1) descriptive hadith on the Prophet’s traits, (2) Indonesian sermons and mawlid recitations, and (3) contemporary digital media (memes, cartoons, films), using qualitative content analysis. The study finds that controversy stems less from visualization per se than from competing regimes of authority that govern representation: Islamic tradition transmits these canonical verbal portraits, whereas modern media often circulate images detached from those sources, intensifying public dispute. Bridging textual scholarship and social practice, the article shows how syamāʾil-based descriptions are orally received in devotional settings and how their norms of reverence collide with satire- and free-speech logics online, clarifying why certain images provoke offense while others do not. ]]>
