Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Law
Ohandi, Max Andrew
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
“Analisa Dissenting Opinion Dalam Hasil Putusan Permohonan Perkara Nomor 35/PUU/XXII/2024 Terhadap Pasal 35 Ayat 1 UU No 13 Tahun 2023 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan Ohandi, Max Andrew; Syam, Radian
Postulat Vol 3 No 1 (2025): POSTULAT: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/postulat.v3i1.1837

Abstract

This research highlights Judge Guntur Hamzah's dissenting opinion in the Constitutional Court's decision regarding Article 35 paragraph (1) of Law no. 13 of 2023 concerning Employment. He criticized the phrase "recruit the required workforce clarity" which has the potential to give rise to legal uncertainty and discrimination, especially regarding age limits and appearance requirements. This dissenting opinion provides an alternative perspective that encourages critical reflection on the majority decision. The implication is the need for legal revisions for justice and inclusiveness, punctuation increasing public awareness about discrimination. The research method uses normative juridical methods with a literature approach. Research recommendations include reviewing Article 35 paragraph (1), stricter law enforcement, and developing fair employment policies.
Co-Authors Radian Syam, Radian