Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Protection of Medical Personnel in Armed Conflict: A Review of the Provisions of International Criminal Law Eka Priyanto; Ery Rachma Firsanti; Tri Agus Haryono
Formosa Journal of Sustainable Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): April, 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjsr.v3i4.8957

Abstract

The protection of medical personnel in armed conflict is an important issue in international criminal law. This article provides an overview of the provisions governing such protection. This review covers various aspects, from the definition of medical personnel to the protection afforded in conflict situations. This research uses document analysis methods to collect data from various sources such as international conventions, agreements and other legal documents. It is hoped that the findings of this research will provide a better understanding of the protection of medical personnel in the context of international criminal law
Analysis of the Legal Consequences of Delays in Taking Over Shares Regarding KPPU Decision Number 05/KPPU-M/2022 Ade Rizki Saputra; Siti Handayani Herdiyanti; Miliyandra; Ery Rachma Firsanti
Formosa Journal of Sustainable Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): April, 2024
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjsr.v3i4.8962

Abstract

The KPPU's decision in the case of alleged delay in the acquisition of shares of PT Lestari Gemilang Intisawit in PT Nabati Agro Subur (number: 05/KPPU-M/2022) emphasizes the importance of notifying shareholders regarding the takeover of shares in accordance with Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Monopoly Practices and Business Competition Against the Law. Good. After reviewing the decision, it was decided that PT Gemilang Lestari Intisawit had an obligation to notify the KPPU regarding the takeover as a subsidiary. However, even though this transaction increases the asset value and sales value of the parent company, there is a disparity between activities that are detrimental to other business actors and the fine imposed is only 1 billion rupiah. This shows the need for further evaluation of this decision to ensure fairness in law enforcement regarding fair business competition and protecting market interests