Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar PEDAGOGIC: Indonesian Journal of Science Education and Technology
Nurrahmayani
Unknown Affiliation
Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
MEMBEDAKAN AUTENTISITAS GAGASAN PENULIS MANUSIA DAN TEKS GENERATIF AI BERBAHASA INDONESIA Nurrahmayani
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 03 (2026): Volume 11 No. 03, September 2026 Processed
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i03.65123

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI) technology in the production of Indonesian-language text presents new challenges for maintaining academic integrity and the authenticity of written works. This phenomenon has sparked concerns about the erosion of originality of ideas and the increasingly blurred line between original human thought and algorithmic output. This study aims to formulate comprehensive differentiation indicators to distinguish the authenticity of human authors’ ideas from AI-generated texts based on the Indonesian language. The method used is qualitative descriptive analysis through critical discourse analysis and syntactic analysis of a comparative corpus, consisting of students’ academic papers and AI-generated texts based on similar (prompts). The evaluation focused on the depth of argumentation, cohesion-coherence structure, stylistic dynamics, and syntactic uniqueness. The results indicate that AI-generated texts tend to exhibit rigid sentence patterns, repetitive logical structures, and a lack of constructions reflecting subjective experiential context. In contrast, human writing exhibits rhetorical depth, flexibility in syntactic variation, and originality of ideas rooted in critical reasoning. These findings yield a new analytical framework that higher education institutions can apply to detect and validate the authenticity of academic works in Indonesian more objectively.
Penerapan Project-Based Learning (PjBL) untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Yusni, Yusni; Saputra, Yogi Setiadi; Bakri, Marlina; Nurrahmayani
PEDAGOGIC: Indonesian Journal of Science Education and Technology Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): PEDAGOGIC: Indonesian Journal of Science Education and Technology (In-Press)
Publisher : Lembaga Intelektual Muda (LIM) Maluku

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54373/ijset.v6i4.6623

Abstract

Students' critical thinking skills are still relatively low, mainly due to the learning process being dominated by conventional approaches, centered on lecturers, and emphasizing memorization. This condition has the potential to hinder students' readiness to face the academic and workplace demands of the 21st century. One learning model that is considered capable of addressing this problem is Project-Based Learning (PjBL). This study aims to analyze the improvement of students' critical thinking skills through the application of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in Indonesian Language courses. The study used a quantitative method with a quasi-experimental design in the form of a pretest-posttest. The study sample consisted of 38 sixth-semester Midwifery Study Program students at Mega Buana University, Palopo, selected using a purposive sampling technique. Data were collected through critical thinking skills tests, observations, questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. Quantitative data analysis was conducted by comparing pretest and posttest scores, while qualitative data were analyzed through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results showed an increase in the average critical thinking skills score from 65.24 to 82.37, an increase of 17.13 points. After implementing PjBL, students were predominantly in the good and excellent categories. These findings indicate that PjBL is effective in improving students' critical thinking skills through active engagement in investigation, problem-solving, collaboration, and project development.
Co-Authors Bakri, Marlina Kurnia Lilis Suryani Saputra, Yogi Setiadi Yusni Yusni