Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Review Legal To Comments on Social Media Containing Element Harassment and Assault Psychics in Maros City Adriansyah, Andi Muhammad; Razak, Azkari; Ilham, M. Azham
COMPENDIUM OF JUDGE MADE LAW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Compendium of Judge Made Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/cojml.v1i1.953

Abstract

This research aims to find out and analyze the qualifications for commenting on social media which contain elements of harassment and psychological attacks in criminal acts, knowing and analyzing the judge's legal considerations in deciding case No.14/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn. Mrs. This research was conducted in Makassar City. The research location is the Library of the Faculty of Law, Indonesian Muslim University. This writing was carried out by conducting a literature study in which the author studied by prioritizing the theories that are currently being applied while at the same time obtaining documents or data related to the problem in the author's writing which was then processed and presented descriptively by the author. The results of this research show that in qualifying comments In social media that contains elements of harassment, it is classified as an attack on honor or good name. Based on the Decision of the Panel of Judges No.14/Pid.Sus/2023/Pn.Mrs, the defendant has been proven to have committed the crime of Defamation. After the author examines the decision, the author is of the view and/or opinion that the decision of the panel of judges is appropriate and in accordance with the law because in fact, the elements of the article in which the defendant is accused meet the elements that the author has described.
THE ROLE OF THE MINANGKABAU TRADITIONAL COMMUNITY'S CULTURE OF CONSENSUS BUILDING AS A PILLAR OF DEMOCRACY IN SUPPORTING THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS (SDGs) Arifin, Muhammad Yarif; S, Salle; Bima, Muhammad Rinaldy; Ilham, M. Azham; Ramadhan, Ar Rayhan Wiqra
Jurnal Al-Dustur Vol 9 No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/aldustur.v9i1.10377

Abstract

Indigenous culture plays a vital role in shaping normative frameworks that support modern governance. This study examines the Minangkabau indigenous community’s tradition of consensus-based deliberation (musyawarah) as a democratic pillar that contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 16.7 on inclusive and participatory decision-making. Using a normative legal research method with a qualitative approach, the study explores how Minangkabau customary law integrates communal values into decision-making processes that promote social justice and poverty alleviation. In Minangkabau society, deliberation is not merely procedural but reflects a collective ethic where truth is determined through group consensus rather than individual assertion. This principle fosters inclusive governance, equitable outcomes and social cohesion. The study further analyzes the alignment between this indigenous practice and the Islamic principle of syuraa (consultation), which serves as a moral foundation for participatory democracy in Islamic jurisprudence. The results show that deliberative consensus functions as an effective participatory democracy mechanism based on local wisdom in realizing social justice and poverty alleviation. These findings confirm the relevance of integrating customary values and the principle of syūrā in strengthening equitable social governance and supporting the sustainable achievement of the SDGs.