Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Analisis Kasus Garuda Indonesia vs Rolls-Royce Sebagai Kajian Hukum Perdata Internasional Johari, Abdullah Ahmad; Pratama, M. Andra; Hendriansyah, Nicholas Ferdy; Rizha Claudilla Putri
Majelis: Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November : Majelis : Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/majelis.v2i4.1205

Abstract

Civil relations are not limited to the national sphere, but can also transcend national borders. These relations have existed since ancient Greece and continue to develop today. These transnational relations can give rise to legal issues, such as whether the relationship truly falls within the scope of international relations, the laws that apply to the relationship, and how disputes are resolved using which legal system. The purpose of this study is to analyze the Garuda vs. Rolls Royce case, which is part of international civil relations, raising the question of how this case can be included in the scope of international civil law studies and how one of the international conventions governing transnational civil law principles, namely UNIDROIT, can be applied. This study uses a normative approach that compares national and transnational legal systems to provide perspective on the case and a case approach that clearly explains the Garuda vs. Rolls Royce case, starting from the chronology and analyzing the case from the perspective of international civil law principles The results of this study found that this case falls under the scope of international civil law, where international civil law principles such as UNIDROIT can be applied in order to make progressive legal changes in regulating international civil relations to ensure legal protection and certainty for legal subjects. The implications of this research can be a catalyst for progressive legal changes in regulating international civil relations to ensure legal protection and certainty for legal subjects.
Analisis Implikasi Perceraian Asing terhadap Hak atas Tanah berdasarkan Putusan No. 19/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Sgr. dan Perjanjian Pra-Perkawinan sebagai Solusi Penyelesaian Diva Raniza; M. Indra Pratama; Roger Alfiano; Rizha Claudilla Putri
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i4.1301

Abstract

This paper explores the involvement of International Civil Law in the implications of foreign divorce on land rights by paying attention to the principles contained in International Civil Law. In terms of writing, the author will analyze Decision No. 19/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Sgr. as a review of facts that will be analyzed in accordance with the scope of International Civil Law using relevant research methods. The author reviews that the research method used to compile this writing is juridical-normative based on the applicable laws and regulations and in accordance with what is the subject of discussion. In addition, this paper also pays attention to the theory of legal protection by Philipus M. Hadjon and the principles contained in International Civil Law as supporting aspects in the preparation of this analysis. To strengthen the argument, the author also compares several provisions related to the status of land ownership by foreign parties and the application of pre-marriage agreements as an alternative settlement. The final result of this writing will highlight the correctness of the judge's decision based on the author's analysis and provide suggestions that are considered relevant as solutions that can be offered.
Mediasi sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pembayaran Letters of Credit Erico Dian Pratama; Christin Marito Lumban Toruan; Zhafira Naifah Anidania; Rizha Claudilla Putri
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i1.8621

Abstract

Letter of Credit or L/C is a payment instrument in international trade transactions. Payment through a Letter of Credit is the most ideal form of payment in providing  payment certainty, because in its mechanism, L/C requires  payment to the seller through a bank guarantee with the fulfillment of the conditions specified in the document. Fraudulent letters of credit are disputes between parties in the execution of L/C payments caused by errors or irregularities due to fraud. As a result, in international civil agreements,  such agreements are deemed invalid. Mediation is a method of dispute resolution through non-litigation channels. In mediation, the dispute resolution mechanism is carried out by using a third party called a mediator. This method is highly dependent on the trust of the disputing parties in the mediator. In carrying out their duties, mediators act based on the principles of neutrality, confidentiality, voluntariness, empowerment, and as a provider of recommendations in the course of mediation for dispute resolution. Generally, mediation as a method is rarely applied in cases of international civil dispute resolution, because the resolution of international civil payment disputes is carried out through arbitration. Arbitration is a method of dispute resolution based on an arbitration agreement. An arbitration agreement is an agreement agreed upon by both parties to submit and surrender all matters to an arbitrator.
Transformasi Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Era E-Court: Analisis Procedural Justice antara HIR/RBg dan PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2019 Nanda Nosie Perdana Putri; Nadia Ummi Nabilah; Rizha Claudilla Putri
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Maret: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v3i2.1617

Abstract

The development of information technology has encouraged transformation in the administration and implementation of the judicial system in Indonesia, including within civil procedural law. The civil justice process, which has traditionally relied on manual procedures as regulated in the HIR and RBg, faces several limitations such as lengthy procedures, relatively high costs, and limited access for justice seekers. To address these challenges, the Supreme Court introduced the e-court system as part of judicial modernization through the digitalization of case administration and court proceedings. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of e-court in realizing procedural justice within civil procedural law and to examine the relationship between the classical procedural provisions contained in HIR/RBg and the newer regulations governing electronic court administration. The research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches by examining legal provisions and the concept of procedural justice within the judicial system. The findings indicate that the implementation of e-court reflects a paradigm shift in civil procedural law from a formalistic system toward a more digital and administrative system that improves efficiency in case administration and accelerates dispute resolution. However, this transformation also raises questions regarding the harmonization of legal norms between the regulations governing electronic court systems and the traditional civil procedural rules. Nevertheless, the implementation of e-court has positive implications for the realization of the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice while also improving public access to more effective and efficient judicial services.
Revolusi Digital dalam Hukum Acara Perdata: Penerapan Kecerdasan Buatan dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Rahma Nur Aristawati; Inggrid Yemima Sihombing; Rizha Claudilla Putri
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.4896

Abstract

Transformasi digital dalam praktik hukum acara perdata di Indonesia didorong oleh penggunaan kecerdasan buatan dalam sistem peradilan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mempelajari konsekuensi yuridis dan etis dari penggunaan AI dalam proses peradilan. Khususnya, penelitian ini berfokus pada independensi hakim, akuntabilitas hakim, kemungkinan bias algoritmik, perlindungan data dan privasi, dan jaminan due process of law. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, di mana literatur, regulasi, dan penelitian akademik tentang penggunaan kecerdasan buatan dalam praktik hukum dievaluasi. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa kecerdasan buatan dapat meningkatkan efisiensi, konsistensi, dan akurasi penalaran hukum komputasional. Pertimbangan moral dan diskresi yudisial tetap menjadi komponen penting dalam pengambilan keputusan, AI tidak dapat menggantikan peran hakim sebagai subjek utama dalam penemuan hukum (rechtsvinding). Selain itu, penggunaan AI menimbulkan risiko bias algoritmik, ketidakjelasan akuntabilitas, serta ancaman terhadap perlindungan data dan transparansi proses peradilan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan kerangka regulasi dan tata kelola AI yang adaptif, transparan, serta berbasis etika guna memastikan bahwa transformasi digital dalam hukum acara perdata tetap menjamin keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan perlindungan hak asasi manusia.