Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pendekatan Burhani sebagai Fondasi Rasional dalam Analisis Wacana Ilmiah Islam Nugraha, Aszahra Regita; Faradisa, Amirah; Maulidyah, Shandy; Hastin, Nisrina Nurlaela Yumna; Auliza, Viranda Rizky; Aulia, Izza Asti; Kurniawan, Taufiq
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 4 (2025): November
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17656398

Abstract

Islam has a comprehensive epistemology as the primary foundation for acquiring knowledge. In general, epistemology in Islam exhibits three strong tendencies: bayani, irfani, and burhani. These three forms of reasoning originate from the thoughts of Muhammad Abid al-Jabiri, a contemporary Moroccan philosopher known for his efforts to develop a philosophy that combines rationality, authority, and intuition. According to al-Jabiri, these three forms of reasoning serve not only as tools for acquiring knowledge but also as a way to understand the relationship between humans and God, nature, and themselves. Bayani epistemology emphasizes the study of texts (nas), ijma, and ijtihad as basic references for justifying certain beliefs. This study summarizes the concept that burhani epistemology emphasizes the innate human potential in terms of intuition, senses, experimentation, and conceptualization, expressed as "al-hiss, al-tajribah wa muhakamah 'aqliyah." Bayani reasoning, which focuses on authoritative texts, is used to understand revelation and religious teachings, while irfani reasoning explores deeper dimensions of knowledge through inner experience and mystical intuition. By combining these three types of reasoning, a complete Islamic science will emerge that is able to solve contemporary social problems in the development of Islam. This study was conducted with a qualitative approach using text analysis methods that aim to explore the concepts proposed by al-Jabiri in his work and relate them to epistemological theories that have been introduced in the Islamic philosophical tradition. From the specific analysis, it was found that al-Jabiri considered these three forms of reasoning to be complementary, not contradictory, in an effort to achieve a more comprehensive and holistic understanding of reality.
Tinjauan Ushul Fiqh terhadap Sumber Hukum Islam yang Diperselisihkan Ramadhani, Syafa Al Zahra; Nugraha, Aszahra Regita; Millatillah, Mu’izzatu; Rahmawati, Irma Widya; Wafiuddin, Moch. Danish; Almadani, M. Zaqi; Kurniawan, Taufiq
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 8 (2026): March
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18794248

Abstract

In the study of ushul fiqh, Islamic legal sources occupy a fundamental position as a methodological framework in the process of establishing law. In addition to legal sources that have been widely agreed upon, such as the Al-Qur'an, Sunnah, ijma', and qiyas, there are also a number of other legal sources whose legal status is still debated among ulama. These differences arise due to variations in approaches to understanding propositions, the use of reason, and responses to social dynamics. This article comprehensively discusses disputed sources of Islamic law, including istihsan, maslahah murlah, 'urf, istishab, syar'u man qablana, sahabi school of thought, and sadd az-zari'ah, by highlighting the meaning, basis of argumentation, and its position in the ushul fiqh methodology. This research aims to expand understanding of the function of these legal sources as a means of ijtihad in resolving legal issues that are not explained directly in the Al-Qur'an and Sunnah. The method used is library research with a qualitative-descriptive approach through a review of classical and modern ushul fiqh literature. The analysis was carried out descriptively-analytically to describe the various views of ulama and the limits of application of each legal source. The results of the study show that even though the disputed legal sources are not accepted uniformly by all schools of thought, their existence still has an important role in the development of adaptive and contextual Islamic law. As long as their use does not conflict with the qath'i propositions and remains based on maqashid al-syariah, these legal sources are able to enrich the practice of ijtihad and maintain the relevance of Islamic law in the face of changing times.