Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Local Political Dynamics And Prabowo-Gibran Campaign Strategy In The 2024 Presidential Election In Surabaya City Contestation Analysis Discourse Putra, Steinly Suwanto; Darsono, Darsono; Handayani, Triana Dianita
Jurnal Mamangan Vol 13, No 2 (2024): Special Issue: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Mamangan, Accredited 2 (SK Dirjen Ristek Dikt
Publisher : LPPM Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/mamangan.v12i2.9987

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Dynamics of Local Politics and Prabowo-Gibran Campaign Strategy in the 2024 Presidential Election in Surabaya City. Analysis of Discourse Contestation. This study uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive-critical type of research, aiming to describe how the Prabowo-Gibran campaign strategy is articulated as a hegemonic practice in the public space of Surabaya city, as well as how dominant discourses are produced, circulated, and accepted by the public. The data collection technique in this study uses a qualitative approach with an exploratory strategy. This study shows that the campaign of the Prabowo Subianto-Gibran Rakabuming Raka pair in the 2024 Presidential Election can not only be understood as a conventional electoral process, but as a hegemonic articulation project that successfully unites various discursive elements—including symbols, programs, figures, and political networks—in one dominant political representation block. This campaign strategy successfully constructs a chain of equivalences between demands for the welfare of the common people, youth aspirations, loyalty to Jokowi, and the logic of national development in one coherent populist and affective narrative. The main thesis of this research can be formulated that the Prabowo-Gibran campaign in the 2024 Presidential Election is a form of hegemonic articulation structured through affective, visual, and symbolic strategies, which combine Jokowi's legitimacy, digital populism symbols, and formal and informal electoral networks, in order to form a new political formation compatible with the post-Jokowi order.
Re-examining Amnesty and Abolition Practices in Indonesia: A Normative Evaluation and Framework for Procedural Guidance Putra, Steinly Suwanto; Suarda, Gede Widhiana; Rato, Dominikus; Anggono, Bayu Dwi; Siagian, Ruben Cornelius
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 32 No. 3: SEPTEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art8

Abstract

The granting of amnesty and abolition in Indonesia is a presidential prerogative under Article 14 of the 1945 Constitution. Its practice has exhibited complex and diverse patterns throughout Indonesia’s political history, from the Soekarno era to the Prabowo Subianto administration. It has generated controversy regarding the rule of law, substantive justice, transparency, and the protection of victims’ rights. This study aims to analyze the practice of amnesty and abolition from historical and juridical perspectives, evaluate its implications for the principle of the rule of law, and identify potential abuses of presidential discretion. Methods include case studies, comparative juridical analysis, and review of legal documents such as presidential decrees, Article 14 of the 1945 Constitution, court decisions, BPUPKI minutes, and legal literature. The analysis was conducted using historical, normative, and descriptive argumentative approaches. The results show that political considerations often influence the practice of amnesty and abolition, can create a perception of legal uncertainty, and that the DPR plays only a formal role. Patterns of granting amnesties differ by era: political stabilization (Soekarno, Soeharto); political rights rehabilitation (Habibie, Abdurrahman Wahid/Gus Dur); peace integration (SBY); and individual justice and human rights considerations (Jokowi, Prabowo). This research proposes a legal bureaucratic framework to strengthen transparency, accountability, and substantive justice. In conclusion, amnesties and abolitions should be implemented with due regard for justice, transparency, legal certainty, and public oversight to prevent abuse of power and to maintain public trust in the legal system.