Articles
<![CDATA[KRIMINALISASI DALAM UU NO. 24 TAHUN 2007 TENTANG PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Widiandana Suarda]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Supremasi Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Balitar, Blitar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (331.759 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35457/supremasi.v6i2.393
<![CDATA[Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana merupakan salah satu sumber hukum pidana positif, oleh karena UU tersebut merumuskan Bab Ketentuan Pidana mulai Pasal 75 sampai dengan Pasal 79. Berdasarkan ketentuan pidana tersebut akan dapat diindetifikasi perbuatan-perbuatan apa saja yang merupakan tindak pidana penanggulangan bencana. Lebih lanjut, apabila ada yang melakukan perbuatan yang dilarang itu maka aparat peradilan pidana (polisi, jaksa, hakim, dan pemasyarakatan) akan melakukan penindakan dan penjatuhan pidana. Dengan demikian, UU No. 24 Tahun 2007 telah melakukan kriminalisai terhadap beberapa perbuatan yang terkait dengan masalah kebencanaan. Namun, sekalipun telah diundangkan bukan berarti persoalan telah selesai. Kebijakan kriminalisasi dalam UU No. 24 tahun 2007 tetap harus dianalisis guna mengantisipasi perbuatan-perbuatan kriminal sehubungan dengan penanggulangan bencana di Indonesia. Kajian yang dapat digunakan dalam rangka menganalisis kebijakan kriminalisasi dalam UU No. 24 tahun2007 adalah kajian politik hukum pidana.]]>
<![CDATA[A LITERATURE REVIEW ON INDONESIA’S DERADICALIZATION PROGRAM FOR TERRORIST PRISONERS ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Widhiana Suarda]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 28, No 3 (2016) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (394.816 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16682
<![CDATA[AbstractAfter many terrorists are captured and receive prison sentences, Indonesia instituted a de-radicalization program for terrorist prisoners. As yet, however, Indonesia lacks a national policy for planning, implementing and evaluating the program. The program is currently being developed and managed locally by prison directors consistent with a prison’s circumstances and capability. This article presents a review of the literature on Indonesia’s de-radicalization program for terrorist prisoners. The objectives of this review are to understand the nature of the program, consider the results, and to indicate a new approach for future research. Intisari Setelah banyak teroris ditangkap dan menjalani pidana penjara, Indonesia mulai menjalankan program deradikalisasi terhadap narapidana teroris. Namun demikian, Indonesia belum memiliki kebijakan nasional dalam hal perencanaan, pelaksanaan dan evaluasi dari program deradikalisai. Saat ini, program dikembangkan dan dikelola secara lokal oleh kepala lembaga pemasyarakatan (Kalapas) sejalan dengan keadaan dan kemampuan lembaga pemasyarakatan (Lapas). Artikel ini menyajikan sebuah kajian pustaka tentang program deradikalisasi Indonesia terhadap narapidana teroris. Tujuan dari kajian ini adalah untuk memahami karakter programnya, menelaah hasil-hasilnya, dan untuk menunjukkan sebuah pendekatan baru dalam penelitian mendatang. ]]>
<![CDATA[Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara melalui Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Korporasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Habi Burrohim]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Widhiana Suarda]]>;
<![CDATA[Ainul Azizah]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 11 No. 1 (2022): Juni ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56013/rechtens.v11i1.1137
<![CDATA[Abstrak Tujuan dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis penerapan Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan atau Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) dalam upaya pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara tindak pidana korupsi oleh korporasi dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia dan merumuskan konsep yang tepat di masa yang akan datang dalam pelaksanaan Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan atau Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) guna mendorong pengembalian kerugian keuangan negara yang diakibatkan oleh tindak pidana korupsi korporasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil dalam penelitian ini adalah perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan yang berasal dari rumpun hukum Common Law dapat diterapkan pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dengan didasarkan pada 4 (empat) dasar kajian yakni tujuan sistem peradilan pidana dan asas sistem peradilan pidana dan bahwa konsepsi Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan yang akan diterapkan pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia didasarkan pada Pengertian dan Tujuan Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan, Pihak yang Terlibat dan Kewenangannya, Kualifikasi Tindak Pidana, Syarat Perjanjian Penundaan Penuntutan. Kata kunci: Kerugian Negara, Korupsi, Korporasi, Penuntutan Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyze the application of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) in an effort to recover state financial losses for corruption by corporations in the Indonesian criminal justice system and formulate the right concept in the future in the implementation of the Deferred Prosecution Agreement or Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) to encourage the return of state financial losses caused by corporate corruption. The method of this research is normative juridical. The results in this study are the Delay of Prosecution agreement originating from the Common Law legal family can be applied to the Indonesian Criminal Justice System based on 4 (four) basic studies, namely the objectives of the criminal justice system and the principles of the criminal justice system and that the conception of the Delay of Prosecution Agreement will be applied. The Criminal Justice System in Indonesia is based on the Definition and Purpose of the Suspension of Prosecution Agreement, the Parties Involved and Their Authorities, Criminal Acts Qualifications, Terms of the Suspension of Prosecution Agreement,. Keywords: State Loses, Corruption,Corporation, Prosecution]]>
<![CDATA[Limiting the Legality of Determining Suspects in Indonesia Pre-Trial System ]]>
<![CDATA[Suarda, I Gede Widhiana]]>;
<![CDATA[Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa]]>;
<![CDATA[Priambudi, Zaki]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Review Vol. 11, No. 2 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UI Scholars Hub ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This article aims to examine what the pre-trial judges consider in determining whether a suspect's determination is legal. The basis of the reason "not based on the provisions and legal procedures in force" is a pre-trial petition. Including examining whether the Notification Letter for the Commencement of Investigation has not been submitted to the Reported Party and the Reporting Party, it can be used as a basis for the judge's consideration to judge the legality of the determination of the suspect. This article uses a legal research method through a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. This article finds that after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 and the Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2016, the fulfillment of preliminary evidence, namely that two valid tools of evidence constitute the absolute standard of determining the suspect. Besides, in terms of proof, pre-trial only assesses the validity of formal aspects, which incidentally do not touch the case's subject matter. An application for the cancellation of a suspect's status, for whatever reason, cannot be granted if the initial evidence is not fulfilled, namely the two tools of evidence listed in Article 184 paragraph (1) of the Law of Criminal Procedure (KUHAP). Ultimately, this study recommends the need for affirmation in terms of determining suspects through changing the parameters for deciding suspects in Article 1 point 11 of the Draft of the Law of Criminal Procedure from what was originally only based on "...sufficient preliminary evidence" to "...the fulfillment of two tools of evidence contained in Article 175 paragraph (1) of the Law of Criminal Procedure" to achieve legal certainty and fulfill the suspect's human rights.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pembeli Lelang Eksekusi PUPN dalam Hal Objek Lelang Tanah Kabur ]]>
<![CDATA[Afifah Nur Azizah]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Widhiana Suarda]]>;
<![CDATA[Firman Floranta Adonara]]>
<![CDATA[ Syntax Idea 47-58 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Ridwan Institute ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46799/syntax-idea.v5i1.2101
<![CDATA[Banks are one of the most important financial institutions and have a large role in the economic life of society, considering that banks are one of the people's choices that can provide credit facilities. Problems in the field are increasingly complex with various sources of data used as a reference to find answers from the processes carried out by researchers so that this problem approach method is a sub-method to be able to solve a problem. The auction principles based on the auction regulations include the principle of publicity, the principle of competition, the principle of certainty, the principle of accountability, the principle of efficiency, the principle of balance and the principle of justice in the land auction object, even though there is a certificate of title. on valid Land and SKPT, one of the principles that has not been implemented except for the principle of certainty because it does not involve BPN in taking care of the existence of the object prior to auctioning to find out the location of the land. As a result, one of the principles has an impact on the implementation of the auction principle, namely the principle of accountability and the principle of justice, which is not realized]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PASIEN COVID-19 PADA PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DI RUMAH SAKIT: SEBUAH LITERATURE REVIEW ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Widhiana Suarda]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendi Setyawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Ulfa Elfiah]]>
<![CDATA[ Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 32 No 1 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[UNIB Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33369/jsh.32.1.40-59
<![CDATA[Artikel ini merupakan tinjauan literatur awal yang bertujuan untuk menemukan arah penelitian yang tepat terkait dengan perlindungan hukum bagi pasien COVID-19 di Indonesia. Dalam upaya mencapai tujuan tersebut, kajian dalam artikel ini menggunakan metode literatur review dengan mengumpulkan data dari berbagai sumber literatur seperti buku dan jurnal untuk membandingkan hasil penelitian yang satu dengan yang lainnya. Langkah selanjutnya adalah melakukan identifikasi literatur yang relevan dengan topik yang dibahas. Dari proses tersebut, terdapat 6 penelitian yang relevan untuk di-review. Hasil kajian menunjukkan dua kesimpulan. Pertama, topik penelitian tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien COVID-19 pada pelayanan kesehatan di Rumah Sakit merupakan sebuah topik yang perlu diteliti lebih lanjut mengingat topik tersebut belum dibahas dalam penelitian exisiting. Kedua, metode penelitian empiris maupun non doctrinal perlu dilakukan secara holistik dengan subyek utama adalah pasien COVID-19 termasuk para pihak yang berkaitan langsung dengan pelayanan terhadap pasien COVID-19 di rumah sakit, seperti tenaga kesehatan dan juga pihak pimpinan rumah sakit. Dengan demikian, hasil penelitian empiris tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien COVID-19 pada playanan kesehatan di Rumah Sakit akan dapat memperkaya ilmu pengetahuan, baik untuk bidang ilmu-ilmu rumpun kesehatan, hukum, maupun ilmu-ilmu sosial.]]>
<![CDATA[Pretrial In Indonesian Criminal Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Supriyono Supriyono]]>;
<![CDATA[M. Arief Amrullah]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Widhiana Suarda]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023): June 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Inara ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v4i3.664
<![CDATA[The law is a collection of rules that must be obeyed by all people in a society with the threat of having to compensate for losses or get criminal if they violate or ignore these rules, so that an orderly and fair life in that society can be achieved. The conception that embodies that Indonesia is a state of law basically has joints that are universal, such as the recognition and protection of human rights, the legality of the actions of the state or government in the sense of a legally accountable state apparatus, and the guarantee of Free Justice. The type of writing used by the author is juridical normative (legal research) juridical normative research is carried out by examining various rules of law that have a formal nature, namely laws, regulations and literature that contain theoretical concepts that are then connected to the problems that the author will discuss in this dissertation research. Pretrial as part of the criminal justice system in force in Indonesia is an effort to combat crimes that are penal by using criminal law as the main means of material criminal law and formal criminal law. Pretrial as part of law enforcement, as stated by Barda Nawawi Arief that the problem of law enforcement, both in abstracto and in concreto is an actual problem that has recently received a sharp spotlight from the public. As is the case with the implementation of pretrial which is part of a principle of the rule of law which is that a rule of law has various criteria and elements.Based on the foregoing, the philosophical basis of the pre-trial arrangement in Indonesian criminal law is based on the existence of human rights, namely because Indonesia is a state of law based on Pancasila and recognizes human rights. The idea of a pretrial institution was born from inspiration derived from Habeas Corpus in the Anglo Saxon judiciary, which provided a fundamental guarantee to the human being of the right to independence.]]>
<![CDATA[FORMULASI PIDANA PENUTUPAN KORPORASI ATAS DELIK LINGKUNGAN HIDUP ]]>
<![CDATA[Shofi Munawwir Effendi]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Widhiana Suarda]]>;
<![CDATA[Fiska Maulidian Nugroho]]>
<![CDATA[ Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Veritas et Justitia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i1.6123
<![CDATA[Corporations’ important and strategic role is indispensable to the development of national economy. Even so, economic development should not be used to serve corporation as justification to sacrifice the environment and wellbeing of the society in order to gain maximum profit. Efforts to develop the mechanism of corporate liability for environmental offenses have been continuously done through the Environment Law issued from 1997 to 2009 and regulations in the Job Creation Law. However, the formulation of responsibility for environmental offenses is still relatively weak, coupled with the absence of a provision for when an environmental offense is committed by a corporation, and the inadequate arrangements for executing punishment for corporations. Through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study seeks to formulate criminal formulations that can be applied to corporations for environmental offenses. In this case, the research is focusing on the additional penalty of corporation dissolution which is seen as the ultimate punishment for corporate law subjects. The existence of dissolution as punishment might serve as an answer to other problems within the realms of environmental law enforcement. This study aims to present provisions of criminal penalties against corporations that pollute and/or damage the environment through editorial norms construction.]]>
<![CDATA[Dampak Overcrowded Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Terhadap Upaya Pemenuhan Hak Kesehatan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Kasus Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas I Malang) ]]>
<![CDATA[Alfalah Naufal Yufianda]]>;
<![CDATA[I Gede Widhiana Suarda]]>;
<![CDATA[Dina Tsalist Wildana]]>;
<![CDATA[Fanny Tanuwijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Sapti Prihatmini]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Edisi Februari 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Scholar Center ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v4i1.102
<![CDATA[Pandemi Covid-19 yang melanda dunia terkhusus di Indonesia, menyebabkan Lapas menjadi salah satu tempat yang beresiko tinggi penyebaran Covid-19. Kondisi terebut diperparah dengan tingkat hunian Lapas yang melebihi kapasitas (overcrowded) menyebabkan diharuskan adanya penyesuaian kebijakan untuk menangani keadaan tersebut. Mengingat kondisi tersebut, maka berdampak pada pemenuhan hak-hak warga binaan pemasyarakatan didalamnya terutama hak mendapatkan akses kesehatan dan makanan yang layak. Hak untuk mendapatkan pelayanan kesehatan merupakan suatu hak asasi manusia dan harus diwujudkan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Dengan mendapatkan pelayanan kesehatan yang baik dapat meningkatkan kualitas kesehatan yang lebih tinggi dari sebelumnya. elayanan kesehatan akan terganggu apabila jumlah tahanan dan narapidana tidak terkendali sehingga menciptakan situasi kelebihan kapasitas (overcrowded) sehingga menciptakan situasi yang dapat mengancam kesehatan narapidana. Dalam waktu yang bersamaan di tengah situasi overcrowded yang terjadi di Lapas di Indonesia, negara menghadapi situasi bencana non alam yang melanda dunia, yaitu pandemi Corona Virus Disiase (Covid-19) yang telah menyebar masif di Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Illicit Cigarette Trade in Indonesia: Trends and Analysis from the Recent Judgments ]]>
<![CDATA[I Gede Widhiana Suarda]]>;
<![CDATA[Evan Hamman]]>;
<![CDATA[Bayu Dwi Anggono]]>;
<![CDATA[Fendi Setyawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Moch. Marsa Taufiqurohman]]>;
<![CDATA[Zaki Priambudi]]>
<![CDATA[ Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 8 Issue 1, January 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol8.Iss1.2726.pp38-59
<![CDATA[The illicit cigarette trade has begun to receive scholarly attention globally. Empirical studies on the illicit cigarette trade are available in the context of Indonesia. However, the Indonesian judicial system lacks a focus on treating illegal practices. To fill the gap, we examine Indonesian court decisions involving the illicit cigarette trade between 2010 and 2019. We provide an overview of the enforcement of Indonesia’s Excise Law 2007 relating to offences related to the illicit cigarette trade. By using a systematic quantitative literature review, we collected data on Indonesian court decisions and found the following: (1) convictions for the practice of illicit trade in cigarettes were relatively steady, with a total number from one to six court decisions annually; (2) certain offences from Indonesia Excise Law 2007 have not been found in the convictions, suggesting their underutilisation in terms of monitoring and enforcement effort; (3) the primary motivation of illicit cigarette traders as reported through the judicial system is the economic benefit or “profit” available to the enterprise; and (4) the sentencing decisions are dominated by the application of the “cumulative principle” with fines and imprisonment applied at the same time. The finding on the average length of imprisonment for illicit cigarettes, which was around 18 months, shows that this crime has low risk compared with the punishment for illicit trade in drugs and narcotics in Indonesia.]]>
