Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Digital Governance Gap in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Study of Indonesia, India, and the Philippines Rahmansya, Junaedi; Mehta, Arjun; Bautista, Mark Joseph
Asian Digital Governance Problems Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Asian Digital Governance Problems
Publisher : Asian Digital Governance Problems

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71435/643063

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the digital governance gap in Southeast Asia through a comparative analysis of Indonesia, India, and the Philippines, aiming to understand how institutional dynamics shape the uneven progress of digital transformation across developing democracies. Subjects and Methods: Using a qualitative comparative design, the research integrates institutional capacity theory with digital governance maturity models and draws on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with policymakers, ICT officials, and academic experts conducted between 2023 and 2024. Results: The findings reveal that-differences in digital governance performance stem largely from institutional and governance factors rather than technological capacity. India’s centralized coordination under its national digital strategy ensures strong policy coherence but limits local flexibility; Indonesia’s decentralized framework fosters innovation but leads to fragmented implementation; and the Philippines’ localized experimentation enhances participation yet struggles with continuity. The discussion emphasizes that digital transformation succeeds when institutions balance standardization with adaptability and participation with authority, underscoring the role of leadership stability, bureaucratic learning, and inclusive policy design. Conclusions: Overall, the study contributes to the broader understanding of digital governance in emerging democracies by demonstrating that effective digital transformation requires building adaptive and coherent institutions as much as technological infrastructure. These insights have significant implications for policymakers seeking to promote equitable, sustainable, and participatory digital governance across Southeast Asia.
Lived experiences of patients with hypertension in managing daily life challenges: A phenomenological study Mehta, Arjun; Sharma, Priya; Petel, Rahul; Reddy, Ananya
Indonesian Journal of Health Services Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): July - September
Publisher : Science Center Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63202/ijhs.v2i3.112

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a major global health problem that not only leads to serious medical complications but also significantly impacts patients’ psychological, social, and daily life functioning. Despite the availability of effective pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, many individuals continue to struggle with uncontrolled blood pressure due to lifestyle, emotional, and systemic barriers. Understanding the lived experiences of patients is crucial for developing patient-centered interventions. Objective: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of patients with hypertension in managing daily life challenges, focusing on their burdens, coping strategies, and interactions with healthcare systems. Methods: A qualitative study with a phenomenological approach was conducted in a referral hospital and selected community health centers. A total of 18 participants with a confirmed diagnosis of hypertension were recruited purposively. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. Themes and subthemes were developed to capture participants’ voices and experiences. Results: Three major themes emerged: (1) physical and emotional burdens, which included disruption of daily activities and fear of complications; (2) navigating lifestyle modifications, encompassing struggles with dietary restrictions and difficulties in maintaining medication and exercise routines; and (3) coping strategies and sources of resilience, which highlighted the role of social and familial support and spiritual as well as personal coping mechanisms. These themes demonstrated that patients face persistent barriers in managing hypertension but also develop adaptive strategies to sustain daily life. Conclusion: Living with hypertension involves multidimensional challenges beyond biomedical management, including psychological, social, cultural, and spiritual aspects. Patients often struggle with adherence to treatment and lifestyle modifications but demonstrate resilience through social support and personal coping strategies.