Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JPH Galunggung
Dede Permana
Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Galunggung
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
IMPLIKASI KETERLAMBATAN PERPANJANGAN SURAT IJIN PRAKTIK TENAGA MEDIS DALAM PELAYANAN KESEHATAN Ai Uuh Muhlasoh; Mery Herlina; Dede Permana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/jphgalunggung.v2i3.82

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of a Practice Permit (SIP) as the legal and administrative basis for medical personnel to legally provide health services to the public. According to Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, a SIP is valid for five years and must be renewed before it expires. Delays in the SIP renewal process can result in medical personnel being deemed illegal in their practice, which can lead to termination of services and the threat of legal and administrative sanctions. The purpose of this study is to determine and analyze the impact of delays in SIP renewal on health services and to identify obstacles and efforts made by medical personnel in the process, specifically at Jasa Kartini Hospital in Tasikmalaya City. The research method used is empirical juridical, namely a combination of a normative approach and empirical observation in the field. The results show that the main obstacles in SIP renewal include technical issues with the online system, complex administrative requirements, lack of socialization, and high workloads. Suggested solutions include early renewal applications, digitization of required documents, technical training, and improving complaint services from relevant agencies. This study emphasizes the need for reform of the licensing system to ensure the continuity of fair, effective, and legal health services.
PARLIAMENTARY THRESHOLD PADA PEMILIHAN UMUM LEGISLATIF TAHUN 2024 BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIK TEORI KEDAULATAN RAKYAT Nadilla Nur Farah; Mery Herlina; Dede Permana
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung Vol 2 No 3 (2025): Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Galunggung
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.1234/jphgalunggung.v2i3.83

Abstract

The parliamentary threshold is the minimum number of votes that a political party participating in an election must obtain in order to be included in the distribution of seats in the House of Representatives. Since its inception, the parliamentary threshold has always been a subject of debate because it is considered to be contrary to Article 1 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, which states that “sovereignty is in the hands of the people and is exercised in accordance with the law and the theory of popular sovereignty.” This study aims to determine the parliamentary threshold in the 2024 legislative elections based on the perspective of the theory of popular sovereignty and the impact of the parliamentary threshold on the 2024 legislative elections. The research method used is normative juridical with a legislative and conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that the parliamentary threshold contradicts the values contained in Article 1 paragraph (2) and the theory of popular sovereignty, because both require power to come from the people, while the parliamentary threshold negates the voices of the people (voters) whose parties fail to reach the 4% parliamentary threshold requirement. The parliamentary threshold also has a huge impact on the representative system, consisting of positive impacts, namely simplifying the party system and improving the quality of people's representatives, as well as negative impacts, namely the waste of people's votes, political representation, and the dominance of political parties in parliament. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the parliamentary threshold regulation and also adjust it to the proportional election system with an open list.
Co-Authors Ai Uuh Muhlasoh Mery Herlina Nadilla Nur Farah