Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Progresif Jurnal Suara Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Ery Agus Priyono
Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Framework for Resolving Election Violations in Indonesia: Towards Electoral Justice Ali Umar Harahap; Achmad Busro; Ery Agus Priyono; Benny Sumardiana
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.24541

Abstract

Dealing with electoral violations in Indonesia faces persistent challenges, including strict time limits for case resolution, limited effectiveness of sanctions, and weak coordination among law enforcement agencies. Social and political dynamics further complicate evidence gathering, undermining the integrity of the electoral process. Electoral justice is therefore vital, both as a guarantee of legal certainty and a safeguard for voting rights, institutional integrity, and democratic legitimacy. This research applies a normative juridical method combined with qualitative analysis of statutory regulations, scholarly works, and legal records. The results indicate that the main obstacles to enforcement involve regulatory time constraints, ineffective sanctions, and institutional coordination gaps, compounded by socio-political factors. Nevertheless, electoral justice remains essential to uphold the rule of law and ensure free, fair, and genuine elections. Strengthening regulations, enhancing law enforcement capacity, and raising public legal awareness are necessary steps to secure credible elections and maintain democratic legitimacy.
Combating Speculative Investment through Legal and Syariah Literacy: A Community Engagement Approach for Biased Young Investors Aisa Rurkinantia; Bagas Heradhyaksa; Riza Fibriani; Ery Agus Priyono; Muhamad Azhar; Zulkarnaen Ahmad
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) JPHI Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): (January-June 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v9i1.44950

Abstract

Young investors under 30 now constitute 55.8% of Indonesia's 13.7 million individual investors. The national financial literacy index stands at 66.64% and the sharia financial literacy index at 43.42%. This gap leaves young investors highly vulnerable to Fear of Missing Out (FOMO). FOMO-based behaviour may violate Article 91 of Law Number 8 of 1995 on Capital Markets and contradicts DSN-MUI Fatwa Number 80/2011 on sharia investment principles. This program aimed to recalibrate the mindset of the Semarang Young Investor Community from speculative toward legally-aware, analytically-grounded investment practice. The study employed Participatory Action Research (PAR) through an in-person seminar on 1 November 2025 in Semarang. A five-pillar ecosystem was established: UIN Walisongo, IDX Central Java, Mirae Asset Sekuritas, AISA, and the Semarang Young Investor Community. Impact was measured through a mixed-methods design combining pre-test (n=65), post-test (n=45), and Focus Group Discussion (FGD). The mean comprehension score rose from 58.0 to 78.0 — a 20-point gain. The proportion in the High category increased from 19% to 65%. FGD findings confirm that participants identified influencer-based stock promotion as a potential violation of Article 91 and understood DSN-MUI Fatwa Number 80/2011 The program's novelty is threefold: targeting already-included, bias-vulnerable investors; integrating legal literacy as a core component; and combining PAR with a replicable five-pillar ecosystem model. This study proposes a paradigm shift from Education for Inclusion toward Education for Rationality and Legal Awareness. Investor vulnerability to FOMO constitutes a legal protection failure that legal literacy-based community engagement can directly address. This aligns the program with SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions), through its emphasis on investor legal protection, and SDG 4 (Quality Education), through its capacity-building outcome in the partner community.
Digital Transformation of Contract Law: Legal Certainty and Human Rights Protection in AI-Based Contracts Ery Agus Priyono; Olawale Olufemi Akinrinde; Muhammad Najiib Al Fithri; Muhamad Azhar
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n1.p132-166

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) has driven the digital transformation of electronic contracting practices by introducing automated systems and electronic agents. However, using AI to form and execute contracts raises legal issues, particularly regarding the validity of agreements, legal certainty, and the protection of human rights. According to Indonesian contract law, agreements are valid if they meet the requirements of Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) which includes mutual agreement and legal capacity. However, AI lacks free will and legal status. This study aims to analyze the discrepancy between applicable legal norms and the practice of using AI in electronic contracts in Indonesia. This study employs normative legal research with a legislative and comparative law approach, focusing on the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the United Nations Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts. The results reveal that Indonesian positive law does not explicitly regulate the validity or legal liability of AI-based contracts. This lack of regulation has the potential to cause legal uncertainty and substantive injustice. Therefore, it is necessary to harmonize national law with international standards and integrate a human rights–based approach to ensure legal certainty and justice in AI-based contracts.    
EXTENDED LAND-TENURE RIGHTS IN NUSANTARA: A LEGAL ANALYSIS OF REGULATORY INCONSISTENCY AND AGRARIAN JUSTICE Alif Abdurrahman; Budi Santoso; Ery Agus Priyono
Jurnal Hukum Progresif Vol 14, No 2 (2026): October 2026
Publisher : Doctoral of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jhp.14.2.421-458

Abstract

Indonesia’s relocation of its national capital to Nusantara, East Kalimantan, has created a special land-tenure regime designed to accelerate development and attract investment. Under the general agrarian framework established by Law No. 5 of 1960 and Government Regulation No. 18 of 2021, the maximum cumulative duration of the Right to Cultivate is 95 years, while the Right to Build may be granted for up to 80 years. By contrast, the special regulations governing Nusantara allow these rights to extend to 190 years and 160 years, respectively. This study analyses the normative inconsistencies between the national agrarian regime and Nusantara’s special legal framework, as well as their implications for legal certainty, land-rights protection, agrarian justice, and sustainable land governance. It employs a doctrinal legal method using statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials are examined qualitatively through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation, supported by deductive reasoning and Hans Kelsen’s hierarchy of norms theory. The findings show that the extended tenure schemes may be defended under the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali. Nevertheless, their substantial departure from the Basic Agrarian Law creates tension concerning regulatory hierarchy, the social function of land, and the State’s constitutional duty to manage natural resources for the greatest prosperity of the people. The policy may also concentrate land control in business entities, restrict access for local and Indigenous communities, intensify agrarian disputes, encourage speculation, and accelerate environmental degradation. Although long-term tenure may strengthen investor confidence, it should not weaken public oversight, customary rights, or agrarian justice. The study concludes that harmonisation between Nusantara’s special regulations and national agrarian principles is essential. Periodic evaluation, transparent allocation, meaningful community participation, environmental safeguards, recognition of customary tenure, and enforceable obligations for rights holders are required to ensure legally coherent, socially equitable, and environmentally sustainable development.
Co-Authors Achmad Busro Aisa Rurkinantia Ali Umar Harahap Alif Abdurrahman Bagas Heradhyaksa Benny Sumardiana Budi Santoso Muhamad Azhar Muhammad Najiib Al Fithri Olawale Olufemi Akinrinde Riza Fibriani Zulkarnaen Ahmad