Benny Sumardiana
Universitas Negeri Semarang

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

Penerapan Hybrid Learning System di era Pandemi Covid-19 Sebagai Upaya Untuk Mewujudkan Hak Belajar Anak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Sisdiknas di Desa Padasugih Brebes Benny Sumardiana; Silvia Fergina; Siti Nurmala; Tiara Syifa Nanda; Nadya Nur Oktaviani
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v5i1.49910

Abstract

Pendidikan perlu menerima perhatian khusus karena termasuk salah satu amanat konstitusi yang tertuang pada pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 yang secara tegas menyatakan tujuan nasional yaitu mencerdaskan kehidupan bangsa. Namun, tatanan pendidikan di Indonesia berubah semenjak adanya Covid-19. Solusi dalam hal tersebut adalah dengan menerapkan pembelajaran tatap muka berdasarkan kebijakan yang tertuang dalam Surat Keputusan Besama (SKB) Empat Menteri, 20 November 2020. Pembelajaran Hybrid Learning System. Melalui Hybrid Learning System diharapkan pembelajaran dapat terus berjalan secara efektif dengan 3 model yang diterapkan yaitu melalui pembelajaran tatap muka, berbasis online, dan juga berbasis pada komputer. Kelompok Mahasiswa KKNT Unnes 2021 memiliki misi untuk mensosialisasikan kepada masyarakat mengenai pentingnya pendidikan yang berdasarkan pada UU Sisdiknas dan rencana pelaksanaan program bimbingan belajar menggunakan Hybrid Learning System bagi para peserta didik Sekolah Dasar yang berada di Desa Padasugih.
Pemenuhan Hak Atas Rumah Layak Huni Bagi Masyarakat Miskin Miftakhul Ihwan; Cahya Fadillah; Saktiani Nurul Hidayah; Benny Sumardiana
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v5i1.50011

Abstract

Meningkatnya jumlah penduduk berpengaruh pada pemenuhan kebutuhan setiap masyarakat. Pemenuhaan kebutuhan setiap masyarakat merupakan hak dasar manusia yang harus dipenuhi seperti pemenuhan atas pangan, layanan pendidikan, layanan kesehatan, pekerjaaan, dan termasuk pemenuhan hak atas perumahan terkhusus pada masyakat miskin di Desa Luwungragi, Kabupaten Brebes. Pada prinsipnya Hak Asasi Manusia dalam pemenuhan hak atas perumahan yang layak bagi masyarakat miskin merupakan jaminan kepastian hukum atas kepemilikan tanah, ketersedian, keterjangkauan, layak huni, lokasi yang layak, layak secara budaya. Sehingga Prinsip Hak dasar ini sudah diakomodasi dalam hak atas perumahan yang diakui sebagai Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) secara eksplisit didalam Pasal 40 Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia dimana pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia yang merupakan Hak Atas perumahan sudah diakui dalam berbagai hukum HAM Internasional. permasalahan bagaimana upaya pemenuhan hak asasi manusia atas rumah layak huni terhadap masyarakat miskin di desa luwungragi kabupaten brebes dan pelaksanaan pengaturan dan tanggung jawab negara terhadap pemenuhan perumahan bagi masyakat miskin.
Legal Framework for Resolving Election Violations in Indonesia: Towards Electoral Justice Ali Umar Harahap; Achmad Busro; Ery Agus Priyono; Benny Sumardiana
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.24541

Abstract

Dealing with electoral violations in Indonesia faces persistent challenges, including strict time limits for case resolution, limited effectiveness of sanctions, and weak coordination among law enforcement agencies. Social and political dynamics further complicate evidence gathering, undermining the integrity of the electoral process. Electoral justice is therefore vital, both as a guarantee of legal certainty and a safeguard for voting rights, institutional integrity, and democratic legitimacy. This research applies a normative juridical method combined with qualitative analysis of statutory regulations, scholarly works, and legal records. The results indicate that the main obstacles to enforcement involve regulatory time constraints, ineffective sanctions, and institutional coordination gaps, compounded by socio-political factors. Nevertheless, electoral justice remains essential to uphold the rule of law and ensure free, fair, and genuine elections. Strengthening regulations, enhancing law enforcement capacity, and raising public legal awareness are necessary steps to secure credible elections and maintain democratic legitimacy.
REVERSAL EVIDENCE POLICY ON CORRUPTION AS SPECIALIZATION OF CRIMINALIZATION Benny Sumardiana
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2017): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2017)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/nab7gn39

Abstract

Corruption is an extraordinary crime, because corruption happens in all areas of life, and has been done systematically, accordingly extraordinary action is required. To overcome with the occurrence of various type of corruption that required a special strategy. In this article, the authors use normative juridical approach method, that is by doing observation and then review and analyze secondary data in the form of legal materials, especially primary law materials and secondary legal materials. The collected data, both qualitatively and quantitatively, is further classified according to the data types. After that, the results of the study are arranged in a systematic and coherent manner, using problem studies that are specific to take the basics of general knowledge. The conclusion will be drawn in response to the issues that raised in this paper. The legislation that has been regulated the reverse evidence of corruption is considered to be ineffective, in several regulation about corruption, only gratification acts that embrace pure inverse evidence, while others are not purely adherent, whereas the effectiveness of the system of reversal of the burden this evidence is very good if it can be implemented properly and based on strict rules, the problem that concerned in this study is, the contradiction between the presumption of innocence principle and the presumption of guilt principle underlying this evidentiary system. The ideal concept offered in this study is, with the renewal in the setting of the eradication of corruption, and ultimately embraces the reversal of the burden of evidence purely in the corruption trial by considering the concept of equilibrium.
Evaluation of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Justice in the Era of Advanced Artificial Intelligence Technology Benny Sumardiana; Pujiyono Pujiyono; Irma Cahyaningtyas; Cahya Wulandari
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2024)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v9i2.36634

Abstract

Law enforcement is one of the many facets of society that have seen substantial changes as a result of the quick growth of digital technology, especially artificial intelligence (AI). The purpose of this study is to assess how electronic evidence is used in Indonesia's criminal justice system, pinpoint the difficulties encountered, and offer suggestions for enhancing the efficiency and equity of electronic evidence in the age of artificial intelligence. In line with the technological elements included in digital and criminal investigation research methodologies, this qualitative study aids in the creation of a theoretical framework for the use of electronic evidence in the setting of artificial intelligence. The results show that Indonesian law is now able to meet the needs of the digital age with its adaptation to technological advancements. Finding material truth in court proceedings is made possible by electronic evidence, which is legally acknowledged as a legitimate tool in criminal justice. To successfully address these issues and optimize the use of AI in the legal system, it is imperative to develop a strong ethical framework, improve law enforcement capacities, and update rules on a regular basis.
Implementation of Rehabilitation of Narcotics Users as Detention According to Article 127 of Law No. 35 of 2009: A Case Study of BNNP Central Java Widya Oktavia; Benny Sumardiana
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Articles in press
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/llrq.v12i1.41054

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal law regulation of narcotics users based on Article 127 of Law Number 35 of 2009, examine the practice of implementing inpatient rehabilitation for narcotics users sentenced to one year of imprisonment, and assess whether inpatient rehabilitation may be regarded as a form of detention and its implications for the rights of the defendants. The research employs an empirical legal research method with a descriptive analytical approach. Data were obtained through interviews with investigators from the National Narcotics Agency of Central Java Province, as well as an examination of laws and regulations, legal documents, and related literature. The results of the study indicate that, normatively Article 127 of the Narcotics Law has provided a legal basis for the implementation of medical and social rehabilitation as an alternative to punitive criminal sanctions. However, in practice, the implementation of inpatient rehabilitation is not fully consistent with its rehabilitative purpose. In certain circumstances, it functions in a manner similar to detention during the legal process, particularly due to the absence of a clear time limit and divergent interpretations among law enforcement officials. This condition has implications for potential violations of the rights of defendants who use narcotics, especially the right to personal liberty, adequate medical treatment, and humane treatment. Therefore, consistency in the application of Article 127 is needed in line with the principles of restorative justice and the protection of human rights so that rehabilitation truly functions as an instrument of social recovery and reintegration.
The Role of Forensic Laboratory Results in Proving Document Forgery Criminal Offenses: Peran Hasil Laboratorium Forensik dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Dokumen Dona Febiani; Benny Sumardiana
Annual Review of Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/arls.vol1i3.10580

Abstract

Implementation of proof in court should rightfully involve judges evaluating all evidence submitted to the court, including the results of forensic laboratory examinations. However, in reality, in some cases, judges overlook the results of forensic laboratory examinations in proving the crime of document forgery. Therefore, this research aims to understand and analyze the role of forensic laboratory examination results in supporting the proof of document forgery, as well as the considerations of judges in placing and evaluating forensic laboratory examination results used as evidence in court. This study employs a juridical-empirical research method with a qualitative approach using primary and secondary data sources. Data validity is ensured using triangulation techniques, while data analysis is conducted through qualitative narrative analysis. The research findings indicate that: 1) Forensic laboratory examination results on documents play a crucial role in supporting the proof of document forgery crimes, as they can be used by investigators to ascertain the authenticity of a document, aid in identifying suspects, and serve as evidence tools such as expert testimony and/or exhibits in court to support prosecution. 2) Judges assess the validity of forensic laboratory examination results by examining the methodology used in the examination and the credibility of forensic experts in conducting the analysis. Furthermore, forensic laboratory examination results can assist judges in deliberating alongside other relevant and supportive evidence. Therefore, judges may render verdicts with at least two valid pieces of evidence accompanied by their conviction. In conclusion, the findings affirm that forensic laboratory examination results can serve as valid evidence in court, playing a crucial role in supporting the proof of document forgery crimes. These results can influence judges in decision-making and aid in uncovering document forgery crimes.
Legal Protection for Child Sexual Violence Victims: Victimology Perspectives, Challenges, and Policy Solutions in Asia Indah Sri Utari; Ubaidillah Kamal; Diandra Preludio Ramada; Benny Sumardiana; Bhanu Prakash Nunna
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v8n1.p40-77

Abstract

This study critically examines the implementation and effectiveness of legal protection mechanisms for child victims of sexual violence across selected Asian-majority countries. While many nations in the region have ratified international conventions (such as the CRC) and enacted specialized domestic legislation, the reality of enforcement is often undermined by socio-cultural dynamics and systemic weaknesses. Employing a victimology framework, this research analyzes the factors contributing to revictimization and the specific challenges faced by children navigating the criminal justice system within contexts characterized by strong familial hierarchy, community privacy norms, and prevalent gender biases. The study identifies three core implementation challenges common across the region: 1) the pervasive influence of stigma and victim-blaming rooted in traditional values, leading to underreporting and case withdrawal; 2) procedural inadequacies within law enforcement and judicial sectors, resulting in non-trauma-informed practices and secondary harm; and 3) the failure to effectively deliver restitution and holistic rehabilitation services due to funding gaps and lack of integrated inter-agency cooperation. Drawing upon comparative case analysis, this paper proposes alternative solutions that are culturally sensitive yet legally robust. Key recommendations include implementing mandatory specialized judicial training focused on child psychology and trauma-informed interviews, establishing state-funded victim compensation and rehabilitation schemes independent of criminal prosecution outcomes, and promoting community-level restorative justice initiatives that prioritize the child's well-being over solely punitive measures. Ultimately, this study advocates for a paradigm shift from a purely punitive legal response to a comprehensive, victim-centered approach tailored to the unique societal structures of Asian-majority countries.
Customary Council Decisions as Grounds for the Elimination of Prosecution: Notes on the Criminal Procedure Code Aris Hardinanto; Zico Junius Fernando; Nahdiya Sabrina; Eka Nugraha Putra; Benny Sumardiana
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v11i1.31803

Abstract

This article examines whether decisions issued by customary councils should constitute a legal ground for the elimination of prosecution under Indonesia’s Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code. Following the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the National Criminal Code, customary criminal law has been formally recognized as part of Indonesian living law. However, the Criminal Procedure Code does not provide procedural provisions governing the relationship between customary justice mechanisms and the state criminal justice system. Using normative legal research with statutory and case approaches, this study analyzes Supreme Court jurisprudence recognizing customary decisions as a valid basis for eliminating prosecution. The findings indicate that the lack of procedural recognition creates legal uncertainty and undermines the principle of legal pluralism. Therefore, this article proposes the inclusion of a specific provision in the Criminal Procedure Code that recognizes customary council decisions as a ground for eliminating prosecution when the offender has complied with the imposed customary sanction.