Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Al-Hakim : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Hasbullah Hasbullah
Universitas Pancasila
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of Corruption Settlement for Obligor Deviations of Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance (BLBI) Hasbullah Hasbullah
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (May, 2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v4i1.36290

Abstract

The settlement of the BLBI Corruption Case was only focused on the mistakes of former IBRA Chairperson Syafruddin Arsyad Temenggung who issued paid settlement letter to Sjamsul Nursalim as a BLBI obligor which caused 4.58 trillion in financial losses, even though the SKL issuance contained legal slices of the state administration process and civil affairs. The corruption case of the former Chairperson of the IBRA has diverted us all to the main point of corruption errors in the BLBI distribution. Distribution of the Bank Indonesia Liquidity Assistance Facility (BLBI) with a total of 144.53 trillion, from the distribution recorded based on BPK-RI Audit No. 34 I / XII / 11/2006, there was a distribution deviation amounting to 138.44 trillion, but the BPK audit by law enforcement has never been carried out until now. Therefore the problem is focused on two main things, namely whether the settlement of the BLBI Corruption crime in the case of the IBRA chairman issuing SKL to Sjamsul Nursalim has resolved the BLBI corruption case and how the law enforcement policy in BLBI corruption settlement has cost the state 138,44 trillion . Using a normative juridical method that is qualitative in nature, the research results show that the settlement of BLBI corruption in the case of the IBRA chairman issuing SKL to Sjamsul Nursalim is not the case for BLBI irregularities and even in the legal doctrine of the case is not a corruption case due to a legal clash state administration and civil law. and there has been a transfer of corruption eradication in the case of BLBI distribution which has cost the country a total of 138.44 trillion, because law enforcers must enforce the law against alleged BLBI corruption with criminal mechanisms and if possible civilian efforts.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tax Dispute Resolution in Realizing Justice in the Tax Court R. Narendra Jatna; Hasbullah Hasbullah; Abdul Kadir Jaelani
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 8 No. 1 May 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v8i1.15134

Abstract

The increase in the intensity of audits and digitalization of tax administration in Indonesia has encouraged an increase in the number of tax disputes, thus demanding a resolution mechanism that is not only administratively efficient, but also able to ensure objectivity, substantive justice, and legal certainty. This study aims to analyse the effectiveness of the tax dispute resolution mechanism, especially at the objection stage at the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) and the appeal stage at the Tax Court, and examine the implications of institutional reform after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 26/PUU-XXI/2023 and the development of tax digitalisation on the quality of dispute resolution. The discussion was carried out by examining the structure of the objection authority, the quasi-judicial character of the Tax Court, and the use of electronic evidence in the trial process. The results of the study show that the objection mechanism has not functioned optimally as an initial filter for disputes because of structural conflicts of interest, information asymmetry, low transparency, and a lengthy process; therefore, it is often perceived as an administrative formality. At the appellate level, the Tax Court faces a backlog of cases, the complexity of modern tax disputes, and the limited capacity and consistency of judges' considerations, which affect the predictability of decisions. Thus, it is concluded that institutional reform and tax digitalisation have the potential to strengthen the independence and efficiency of tax dispute resolution; however, regulatory harmonisation, institutional capacity building, and strengthening electronic evidentiary standards are required to realise a fair and credible tax dispute resolution system.
Keadilan Restoratif dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia: Antara Regulasi dan Implementasi R. Narendra Jatna; Hasbullah Hasbullah
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v11i6.64583

Abstract

Keadilan restoratif berkembang sebagai paradigma penyelesaian kasus pidana yang menekankan pada pemulihan korban, akuntabilitas pelaku, dan harmonisasi sosial. Dalam reformasi hukum pidana nasional, konsep keadilan restoratif mulai diakomodir melalui KUHP yang baru, arah reformasi KUHP, dan berbagai regulasi sektoral lembaga penegak hukum. Namun, aturan tersebut masih menunjukkan kecenderungan untuk mempersempit makna keadilan restoratif hanya menjadi mekanisme penghentian kasus atau penyelesaian tindak pidana tertentu. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan keadilan restoratif dalam KUHP dan reformasi KUHP serta mengkaji kesesuaiannya dengan konsep filosofis keadilan restoratif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan hukum dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa reformasi hukum pidana nasional belum sepenuhnya menempatkan keadilan restoratif sebagai paradigma pemulihan dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Keadilan restoratif masih dipahami secara pragmatis sebagai instrumen penanganan kasus yang efisien, meskipun secara filosofis keadilan restoratif menekankan pemulihan hubungan sosial dan keadilan substantif. Oleh karena itu, perlu dirumuskan kembali pengaturan keadilan restoratif agar lebih sejalan dengan nilai filosofis keadilan restoratif dalam hukum pidana modern.
Co-Authors abdul kadir jaelani R. Narendra Jatna