Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) Principles in Improving Company Performance in Indonesia Nada Adista Rambe; Adelia Salsabila Marbun; Ahmad Asri Nasution; Ahmad Deedad; Taufik Hidayat Batubara
Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): ISNU Sahabat Mei 2025
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jsisnu.v2i2.824

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles in Indonesian companies and assess their effectiveness in improving corporate performance and accountability. GCG implementation is becoming increasingly important with the increasing demands for transparency, accountability, and corporate social responsibility. This study uses a normative-juridical approach and a literature review method, reviewing legal literature, laws and regulations, scientific journals, and reports on GCG implementation in various companies. A descriptive-analytical approach is used to describe the actual conditions of GCG implementation and assess its impact on corporate governance. The results show that although regulations governing GCG principles exist in Indonesia, their implementation still faces various challenges, such as weak management commitment, a lack of understanding of GCG principles, and minimal external oversight. This study recommends the need for regulatory strengthening, increased GCG literacy among business actors, and an active role from supervisory institutions in supporting the creation of good and sustainable corporate governance.
KEADILAN BAGI KORBAN: KAJIAN VIKTIMOLOGI DALAM PENANGANAN KASUS TRAGEDI KANJURUHAN Syahnan Habibi Nasution; Ahmad Deedad
ADIDAYA : Aplikasi Pendidikan dan Sosial Budaya Vol 3 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Pengelola Jurnal Politeknik Negeri Ketapang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58466/hpf3d626

Abstract

The Kanjuruhan Tragedy is one of the most devastating humanitarian incidents in the history of Indonesian football, resulting in significant loss of life and numerous injuries. This event not only caused physical harm but also deep psychological trauma for the victims and their families. This study aims to analyze how justice for victims is understood and implemented through a victimological perspective in handling the Kanjuruhan Tragedy case. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the handling of this case still faces various challenges, particularly in fulfilling victims’ rights such as restitution, rehabilitation, and guarantees of non-repetition. A victimological perspective emphasizes the importance of placing victims at the center of the justice process (victim-centered justice), focusing not only on punishing perpetrators but also on the comprehensive recovery of victims. Therefore, more comprehensive efforts are required from the state and law enforcement authorities to ensure substantive justice for victims, including through policy reforms and more effective victim protection mechanisms.