Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal (INS9MJ) Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Cross-Border Arbitration in Indonesia: Between International Arbitration Commitments and Domestic Judicial Practice Annisa Putri Sinaga; Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Khotibul Umam
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1309

Abstract

This paper examines the trends, legal challenges, and effectiveness of cross-border arbitration in Indonesia within the context of contemporary international trade and investment. The rapid growth of global commerce necessitates reliable dispute resolution mechanisms, positioning international arbitration as a preferred alternative due to its neutrality, procedural flexibility, and enforceability under instruments such as the 1958 New York Convention. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes primary and secondary legal sources, including statutory regulations, scholarly literature, and arbitral decisions, through systematic stages of data collection, analysis, and synthesis. The findings reveal that while Indonesia possesses a solid legal framework for arbitration, practical challenges persist, including inconsistent judicial interpretations, limited institutional capacity, high procedural costs, and deficiencies in arbitration clause drafting. These factors affect the effectiveness and credibility of international arbitration. The study argues that the principal challenge does not lie in the inadequacy of Indonesia's arbitration legislation, but rather in the inconsistent interaction between domestic judicial practice and international arbitration commitments. It contributes to the existing literature by proposing a harmonized interpretative framework that reconciles national judicial sovereignty with Indonesia's obligations under the New York Convention, thereby strengthening legal certainty in cross-border commercial dispute resolution.
Zina in the Digital Era: New Challenges for the Enforcement of Islamic Criminal Law Farhan Fathur Rahman; Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan; Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago; M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih; Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Nine Star Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v3i1.1330

Abstract

This paper examines the transformation of zina in the digital era and its implications for the enforcement of Islamic criminal law. The background of the study is rooted in the emergence of technology-mediated sexual practices such as sexting, cybersex, and the online dissemination of intimate content that challenge the classical fiqh conception of zina as a physical act subject to strict ḥudūd evidentiary standards. Using a qualitative normative-empirical research method, the study analyzes classical fiqh sources, contemporary legal literature, and documented digital practices. The research stages include problem identification, literature review, data collection on digital behaviors, analysis through maqāṣid al-sharīʿah and ijtihād frameworks, and synthesis of findings. The results show a significant juridical gap between traditional evidentiary mechanisms and digitally mediated sexual misconduct, compounded by issues of digital evidence reliability, jurisdiction, and privacy protection. The discussion highlights both the enduring relevance and structural limitations of classical evidentiary paradigms, underscoring the need for adaptive, multidimensional legal approaches within Islamic criminal law.
Cross-Border Arbitration in Indonesia: Between International Arbitration Commitments and Domestic Judicial Practice Annisa Putri Sinaga; Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung; Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe; Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar; Khotibul Umam
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1309

Abstract

This paper examines the trends, legal challenges, and effectiveness of cross-border arbitration in Indonesia within the context of contemporary international trade and investment. The rapid growth of global commerce necessitates reliable dispute resolution mechanisms, positioning international arbitration as a preferred alternative due to its neutrality, procedural flexibility, and enforceability under instruments such as the 1958 New York Convention. Using a normative juridical approach, this study analyzes primary and secondary legal sources, including statutory regulations, scholarly literature, and arbitral decisions, through systematic stages of data collection, analysis, and synthesis. The findings reveal that while Indonesia possesses a solid legal framework for arbitration, practical challenges persist, including inconsistent judicial interpretations, limited institutional capacity, high procedural costs, and deficiencies in arbitration clause drafting. These factors affect the effectiveness and credibility of international arbitration. The study argues that the principal challenge does not lie in the inadequacy of Indonesia's arbitration legislation, but rather in the inconsistent interaction between domestic judicial practice and international arbitration commitments. It contributes to the existing literature by proposing a harmonized interpretative framework that reconciles national judicial sovereignty with Indonesia's obligations under the New York Convention, thereby strengthening legal certainty in cross-border commercial dispute resolution.
Co-Authors Ahmad Yasin Dongoran Annisa Putri Sinaga Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago Farhan Fathur Rahman Habiburriziq El Ardhy Saragih Khotibul Umam M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih Muhammad Fazli Pratama Putri Ramadhani rangkuty Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe