Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal (INS9MJ) Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
The Legal Authority of Arbitral Awards in the Indonesian Judicial System: Reconciling Party Autonomy, Judicial Supervision, and Legal Certainty Abdul Hakim; Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago; Yara Shita; Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1307

Abstract

Arbitration has become an increasingly important mechanism for resolving commercial disputes due to its efficiency, finality, and procedural flexibility. Nevertheless, the legal force of arbitral awards within Indonesia's judicial system remains conceptually debated because such awards originate from private agreements while simultaneously requiring judicial recognition and enforcement under public law. Existing scholarship has predominantly examined arbitral awards from procedural perspectives, particularly regarding enforcement and annulment, with limited attention to the institutional foundations that determine their legal authority. This study aims to analyze the legal force of arbitral awards within Indonesia's judicial system and to reconstruct the interaction between contractual autonomy, judicial supervision, and statutory legitimacy in determining their binding effect. Employing normative legal research through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes legislation, legal doctrines, arbitral awards, and relevant scholarly literature using systematic legal interpretation and prescriptive legal reasoning. The findings demonstrate that the legal force of arbitral awards is not derived solely from party autonomy but from the interaction of four complementary dimensions: contractual legitimacy, procedural integrity, institutional recognition through limited judicial supervision, and international legitimacy under the 1958 New York Convention. Judicial oversight functions as a procedural safeguard rather than substantive appellate review, thereby preserving arbitral finality while ensuring legal certainty. This study contributes to contemporary arbitration scholarship by proposing an integrated conceptual framework explaining how privately generated arbitral awards acquire public legal authority within Indonesia's judicial system, thereby strengthening legal certainty, investor confidence, and the effectiveness of commercial dispute resolution.
Zina in the Digital Era: New Challenges for the Enforcement of Islamic Criminal Law Farhan Fathur Rahman; Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan; Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago; M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih; Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung
ISNU Nine-Star Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Nine Star Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/ins9mj.v3i1.1330

Abstract

This paper examines the transformation of zina in the digital era and its implications for the enforcement of Islamic criminal law. The background of the study is rooted in the emergence of technology-mediated sexual practices such as sexting, cybersex, and the online dissemination of intimate content that challenge the classical fiqh conception of zina as a physical act subject to strict ḥudūd evidentiary standards. Using a qualitative normative-empirical research method, the study analyzes classical fiqh sources, contemporary legal literature, and documented digital practices. The research stages include problem identification, literature review, data collection on digital behaviors, analysis through maqāṣid al-sharīʿah and ijtihād frameworks, and synthesis of findings. The results show a significant juridical gap between traditional evidentiary mechanisms and digitally mediated sexual misconduct, compounded by issues of digital evidence reliability, jurisdiction, and privacy protection. The discussion highlights both the enduring relevance and structural limitations of classical evidentiary paradigms, underscoring the need for adaptive, multidimensional legal approaches within Islamic criminal law.
The Legal Authority of Arbitral Awards in the Indonesian Judicial System: Reconciling Party Autonomy, Judicial Supervision, and Legal Certainty Abdul Hakim; Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago; Yara Shita; Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Mei
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1307

Abstract

Arbitration has become an increasingly important mechanism for resolving commercial disputes due to its efficiency, finality, and procedural flexibility. Nevertheless, the legal force of arbitral awards within Indonesia's judicial system remains conceptually debated because such awards originate from private agreements while simultaneously requiring judicial recognition and enforcement under public law. Existing scholarship has predominantly examined arbitral awards from procedural perspectives, particularly regarding enforcement and annulment, with limited attention to the institutional foundations that determine their legal authority. This study aims to analyze the legal force of arbitral awards within Indonesia's judicial system and to reconstruct the interaction between contractual autonomy, judicial supervision, and statutory legitimacy in determining their binding effect. Employing normative legal research through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes legislation, legal doctrines, arbitral awards, and relevant scholarly literature using systematic legal interpretation and prescriptive legal reasoning. The findings demonstrate that the legal force of arbitral awards is not derived solely from party autonomy but from the interaction of four complementary dimensions: contractual legitimacy, procedural integrity, institutional recognition through limited judicial supervision, and international legitimacy under the 1958 New York Convention. Judicial oversight functions as a procedural safeguard rather than substantive appellate review, thereby preserving arbitral finality while ensuring legal certainty. This study contributes to contemporary arbitration scholarship by proposing an integrated conceptual framework explaining how privately generated arbitral awards acquire public legal authority within Indonesia's judicial system, thereby strengthening legal certainty, investor confidence, and the effectiveness of commercial dispute resolution.
Abortion Law in Indonesia: Reconciling Criminal Justice, Islamic Law, and Human Rights Dinda Ayu Arini Chaniago; Noor Azizah
Hakamain: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): HAKAMAIN: Journal of Sharia and Law Studies
Publisher : Yayasan Lembaga Studi Makwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57255/hakamain.v5i1.1814

Abstract

This study aims to analyze abortion law in Indonesia through the perspectives of criminal justice and Islamic law, particularly following the enactment of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code. The study examines the legal construction of abortion offences, the criminal regulation established under Indonesia’s new Criminal Code, and the extent to which these provisions correspond with Islamic legal principles and human rights considerations. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by library research involving the analysis of primary legal materials, including legislation and Islamic legal sources, as well as secondary materials consisting of scholarly works and academic studies on abortion regulation. The findings demonstrate that Indonesian criminal justice maintains abortion as a prohibited act subject to criminal sanctions while providing limited legal exceptions for pregnancies resulting from rape or sexual violence and for medical emergencies. From the perspective of Islamic law, these exceptions may be accepted when they fulfil the principles of necessity and are consistent with the objectives of maqasid al-shari’ah, particularly the preservation of life (hifz al-nafs) and the preservation of progeny (hifz al-nasl). The study concludes that abortion regulation in Indonesia represents a legal reform effort aimed at balancing criminal responsibility, Islamic legal values, and human rights protection. This research contributes academically by enriching the discourse on abortion law reform and demonstrating how criminal justice and Islamic law interact in addressing reproductive issues within a contemporary legal system.
Co-Authors Abdul Hakim Annisa Putri Andini Tanjung Farhan Fathur Rahman M. Rangga Syahputra Saragih Noor Azizah Rahma Fitri Amelia Hasibuan Wenni Nahdiani Tanjung Yara Shita