Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis dan Evaluasi Pengerjaan Soal TOEFL “Structure and Written Expression” Muhammad Syar’i Ramadhoni; Helmi; Wahdinah; Meilinda Salsabila Mawaddah; Muhammad Indra Saputra
Educational Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): AGUSTUS-OKTOBER
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/zj6qqc37

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and evaluate the process and results of completing the TOEFL (Test of English as a Foreign Language) items in the Structure and Written Expression section. The primary focus is to identify the types of errors most frequently made by test-takers, the patterns of difficulties encountered, and the factors influencing their performance in this section.The research employed a mixed-methods approach, involving a quantitative analysis of test answer data and an in-depth qualitative analysis. The qualitative analysis was conducted through structured interviews to directly explore test-takers' thoughts, completion strategies, and perceptions of difficulty. Additionally, observation of the test-taking process and document analysis of the test results were performed to complement the data. Quantitative analysis results indicate that participants predominantly make errors on specific topics, such as subject-verb agreement and parallel sentence structure. Meanwhile, the qualitative analysis from the interviews reveals that a lack of deep understanding of formal grammar and time constraints are significant obstacles affecting their performance. This evaluation concludes that a learning strategy more focused on syntactic rules and academic writing principles is necessary to enhance the participants' competence in the TOEFL Structure and Written Expression section. The findings of this research are expected to provide practical input for educators and test material developers.
Analisis Fiqh Kontemporer tentang Nikah Beda Agama dan Relevansinya dengan Moderasi Beragama Muhammad Syar’i Ramadhoni; Ahmad Rifki; Helmi
Sujud: Jurnal Agama, Sosial dan Budaya Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): JANUARI
Publisher : Indo Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63822/14dqce82

Abstract

The issue of Interfaith Marriage presents a complex discourse in Islamic law, creating tension between nash (sacred texts) and contemporary social realities. This research aims to analyze the perspective of Contemporary Fiqh regarding the law on Interfaith Marriage and identify its relevance to the Religious Moderation agenda in Indonesia. Employing a qualitative research method with normative-juridical and comparative approaches, this article examines legal texts (fiqh) and concepts of socio-religious ethics. The analysis shows that the majority of Contemporary Fiqh establishes an absolute prohibition (haram). This prohibition is strongly based on the principle of sadd az zari'ah, which means 'blocking the means to evil,' aligning with the ushul fiqh rule: (Preventing harm takes precedence over attaining benefit), in order to safeguard faith (hifz ad-din) and progeny (hifz an-nasl). This ruling is further supported by the Quranic prohibition (Q.S. Al-Baqarah: 221) and Indonesian positive law regulations, specifically Article 40 letter (c) and Article 44 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Meanwhile, Religious Moderation serves as a manhaj as-shifat (methodology of attitude) that demands the implementation of tawassuth (balanced) and i'tidal (just) principles in addressing social realities. In conclusion, the relevance of Religious Moderation lies in ensuring that these fiqh differences are not implemented fanatically (ghuluw) but are managed proportionally to foster social harmony (tasāmuh) in Indonesia.