Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan Mimesis
Azizatul Khairi
Universitas Bengkulu, Indonesia
Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Transformasi Digital Pedagogi Pascasarjana: Mengembangkan Sistem Pembelajaran yang Dipersonalisasi Berdasarkan Preferensi Pembelajaran Individu Azizatul Khairi; Rambat Nur Sasongko; Ijayani Ijayani; Nur Fathanah; Aldian Mapsur Putra
Tarbawi: Jurnal Keilmuan Manajemen Pendidikan Vol 11 No 03 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32678/tarbawi.v11i03.12054

Abstract

This study aims to analyse postgraduate students' learning style preferences based on the VARK model. The study used a quantitative, descriptive survey design. The population in this study comprised all 95 active students in the Postgraduate Program in Educational Administration, and a sample of 72 respondents was selected using purposive random sampling, with a 5% margin of error. Data were collected through a 16-item questionnaire. The data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics, such as percentages and category distributions, to describe the tendencies of students' learning styles, whether unimodal (V, A, R, or K), bimodal (VA, VR, VK, AR, AK, and RK), trimodal (VAR, VAK, VRK, and ARK), or quadmodal (VARK). The results of the study indicate that graduate students predominantly prefer multimodal learning styles, particularly quadmodal (VARK), with 47.22% selecting this style. Multimodal, flexible postgraduate learning strategies accommodate the diversity of student learning preferences and enhance the quality and effectiveness of the learning process. An inclusive, multimodal postgraduate learning approach is conceptually important for accommodating the diversity of student learning preferences.
Eufemisme sebagai Instrumen Ideologis dalam Wacana Kebijakan Makan Bergizi Gratis Ulfa Kurniasih; Azizatul Khairi
MIMESIS Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): JULI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12928/mms.v7i2.16186

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG), which was launched on January 6 2025 with an allocation of IDR 71 trillion, is the largest nutritional intervention in Indonesian history. But on March 31, 2026, the government announced a reduction in distribution from six to five days per week—a policy consistently communicated using the phrase "budget adjustment" and its derivatives. This research aims to reveal the euphemistic function of MBG policy diction, identify the ideology that works behind it, and examine its ecotheological implications for food justice and state responsibility. The approach used is Norman Fairclough's three-dimensional Critical Discourse Analysis (AWK)—text, discursive practices, and social practices—with triangulation of four data sources: formal policies (Inpres No. 1/2025, Presidential Decree No. 83/2024), statements by public officials, independent research reports (CISDI, CELIOS, Bappenas, The Indonesian Institute), and national-international media reports. The results of the analysis found seven systematic euphemistic strategies in MBG policy texts: lexical substitution, nominalization that removes the agent, positive word clusters, naturalization of claims, externalization of responsibility, absent presence of beneficiaries, and concealment of contradictions. Behind this strategy, four ideologies work simultaneously: fiscalism as the highest value, centralism without public deliberation, populism without evidence-based evaluation, and unequal distribution of burdens. From an ecotheological perspective, this policy violates the principles of food justice and produces food waste of 1.1–1.4 million tons per year which damages the ecosystem. The research concludes that policy euphemisms are not just a style of language, but rather ideological instruments that reproduce injustice and weaken public accountability.
Co-Authors Aldian Mapsur Putra Ijayani Ijayani Nur Fathanah Rambat Nur Sasongko Ulfa Kurniasih