Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal Frameworks and Bilateral Cooperation in Combating Human Trafficking on the Indonesia–Malaysia Border Alif Oktavian; R. Dudy Heryadi; Wawan Budi Darmawan; Deasy Silvya Sari
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i1.48876

Abstract

This research aims to examine human trafficking along the Indonesia–Malaysia border in Kalimantan and analyze how bilateral cooperation in border management addresses this issue. Using a qualitative descriptive approach within a normative legal framework, the study finds that human trafficking in Kalimantan is driven by several key factors, including geographic location, cultural ties, economic pressures, and government policies. Border areas such as Entikong, Aruk, and others are particularly vulnerable due to their proximity to Malaysia and strong cross-border ethnic connections. Economic factors, especially limited job opportunities in Kalimantan, push Indonesian migrant workers to seek employment in Malaysia, which offers better income and work options. Government policies, including ratification of international conventions and the establishment of a Task Force, face challenges in implementation. Effective handling of human trafficking requires strong cooperation between Indonesia and Malaysia, including joint patrols, intelligence sharing, joint training programs, collaboration with NGOs, and the development of operational protocols to strengthen border management and protect vulnerable populations.
The Role of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Japan's Fukushima Treated Water Release Policy Alena Alenka; Deasy Silvya Sari; Darmansjah Djumala
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i11.52359

Abstract

Japan's policy of releasing treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant has sparked a global debate over its environmental safety and legitimacy. This issue is not only about the technical aspects of radioactive waste management but also reflects the dynamics of the relationship between science, politics, and international belief. This study aims to analyze the role of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in supervising and verifying Japanese policies through the framework of institutional neoliberalism and the classification of the role of international organizations according to Clive Archer. Using a qualitative approach based on an analysis of official documents, IAEA submissions, and related stakeholder responses, the study found that the IAEA plays a role in three main categories: as an instrument, Japan uses the IAEA to gain scientific legitimacy; as an arena, this organization becomes a space for diplomacy between international actors and the exchange of technical information; and as an actor, the IAEA demonstrates autonomous capacity through the establishment of scientific safety standards and the production of global legitimacy. Although the IAEA report guarantees the safety of the Fukushima wastewater release, the responses of China, South Korea, and Pacific nations reflect a disconnect between scientific and moral legitimacy. Thus, this study confirms that the success of international organizations such as the IAEA depends on their ability to build cross-border trust and sensitivity to global values.