Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik Journal Of Law Sciences (Legisci)
Harmono Harmono
Swadaya Gunung Jati University, Cirebon
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Effectiveness Of Cirebon City Regional Regulation No. 4 Year 2013 On Violations Of The Distribution And Sale Of Alcoholic Beverages In Cirebon City Yodie Pratama Yudha; Farhan Ahmad Fathurahman; Nur Hayati; Harmono Harmono; Moh Sigit Gunawan
Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Equivalent: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial Teknik
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jequi.v6i2.182

Abstract

The objectives of this study are: a) To determine the effectiveness of Cirebon City Regional Regulation No. 4 of 2013 concerning the prohibition of the circulation and sale of alcoholic beverages in Cirebon City; b) To investigate the efforts of the Cirebon City government in tackling the circulation of liquor following the issuance of the Regulation of the Minister of Trade No. 20/M-DAG/PER/4/2014. This study uses a qualitative method. The population includes the Cirebon City Government and the Cirebon City DKUKMPP Office, where alcoholic beverages are sold. The sampling technique used allows the researcher to select information sources based on their relevance and ability to provide necessary data. The data analysis is conducted qualitatively, involving the following steps: 1) Completing any missing data to ensure it is comprehensive and accurate; 2) Reducing and summarizing collected data to focus on key points, which are then systematically organized. The research findings indicate that the circulation of alcoholic beverages in Cirebon City has many adverse effects and negatively influences its development as a City of Guardians. This prompted the local government to prohibit liquor circulation. However, the enforcement of this prohibition has been hindered by the issuance of the Minister of Trade Regulation No. 20/M-DAG/PER/4/2014, complicating efforts by Satpol PP to regulate liquor in certain areas of Cirebon City.
Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) in the Digital Business Dispute Resolution System: The Problem of Regulation Fragmentation and Harmonization of the Digital Justice System in Indonesia Ananda Gymnastiar Dwijaya; Harmono Harmono
Jurnal Legisci Vol 3 No 6 (2026): Vol 3 No 6 June 2026
Publisher : Ann Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62885/legisci.v3i6.1181

Abstract

Background. The development of the digital economy has encouraged the transformation of business dispute resolution mechanisms towards the use of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) as a technology-based dispute resolution instrument. In Indonesia, ODR is developing progressively through various sectoral regulations, such as electronic court mediation, a dispute resolution system for the financial services sector, and an internal dispute resolution mechanism on e-commerce platforms. However, these developments have not been followed by adequate regulatory harmonization and institutional integration. Aims. This study aims to analyze the legal position of ODR within Indonesia's digital business dispute resolution system, identify justice and legal protection issues in ODR practice, and formulate an ideal, harmonized framework for the digital justice system. Methods. This study employs a normative juridical method, using a legislative and conceptual approach. Result. The results of the study show that the main problem of ODR in Indonesia no longer lies in the absence of law, but in the fragmentation of regulations, weak interoperability between digital dispute resolution institutions, and the dominance of private platforms that have the potential to give birth to algorithm-based automated private justice without adequate supervision. Conclusion. The lack of synchronization between ODR and the personal data protection regime, and the absence of an AI Governance framework, show that the digitalization of dispute resolution cannot fully guarantee digital justice. Implementation. It is necessary to harmonize regulations by developing an ODR system interoperable with e-Court, BPSK, and other dispute resolution institutions, accompanied by the standardization of private ODR operators and the strengthening of artificial intelligence governance in the Indonesian legal system.
Co-Authors Ananda Gymnastiar Dwijaya Farhan Ahmad Fathurahman Moh Sigit Gunawan Nur Hayati Yodie Pratama Yudha