Muhammad Rifa'ie
Universitas Halu Oleo

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

KEMAMPUAN MENULIS TEKS PROSEDUR SISWA KELAS VII SMP Zulkifli; Yunus Yunus; La Ode Akhiri Zulzaman; Muhammad Rifa'ie
Jurnal Bastra (Bahasa dan Sastra) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL BASTRA EDISI JANUARI 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, FKIP, Universitas Halu Oleo Kampus Bumi Tridharma Andounohu Kendari, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara – Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36709/bastra.v11i1.1176

Abstract

This study aims to describe the ability of seventh-grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Bungku Selatan in writing procedure texts. Using a quantitative descriptive method with a field research approach, this study involved 75 students as the total sample. The data were collected through a written test in which students were assigned to compose a procedure text based on the given theme. The assessment focused on four aspects: title, structural completeness, linguistic features, and writing conventions. The findings show that 60% of the students (45 learners) achieved the minimum mastery criterion of 66%, while 40% (30 learners) did not meet the standard. The classical mastery level also did not reach the expected threshold of 85%. The analysis of each aspect reveals that the title aspect achieved the highest mastery (100%), whereas the structural completeness (56%), linguistic features (72%), and writing conventions (62.67%) remain below the expected level. Overall, the results indicate that students’ ability to write procedure texts is still insufficient, particularly in applying structure, linguistic features, and proper writing mechanics. These findings suggest the need for improved instructional strategies and more intensive writing practice to enhance students’ proficiency in writing procedure texts.
FAKTOR KESULITAN BELAJAR SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS CERPEN KELAS IX Wa Ode Husniati; Sri Suryana Dinar; La Tike; Muhammad Rifa'ie
Jurnal Bastra (Bahasa dan Sastra) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): JURNAL BASTRA EDISI OKTOBER 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, FKIP, Universitas Halu Oleo Kampus Bumi Tridharma Andounohu Kendari, Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara – Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36709/bastra.v10i4.1280

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the factors of students' learning difficulties in learning to write short stories in class IX of SMP Negeri 1 Kusambi, West Muna Regency. The research method used is a qualitative method with data collection techniques in the form of questionnaires, interviews, and documentation. The subjects of the study were class IX who had difficulty in writing short stories. The instruments used to collect data were questionnaires and interviews. Based on the results of the study with reference to several internal factors, it shows that the cognitive aspect is the main obstacle, where around 74.7% of students have difficulty understanding the structure of short stories (for example, plot and setting) and 78.1% of students admit to having difficulty in mastering vocabulary. In addition, affective factors such as low learning motivation (68.9%) and lack of self-confidence (64.4%) also contribute to the difficulty of writing short stories. Meanwhile, the psychomotor aspect, which includes writing skills and motor skills in writing, also shows obstacles, although the percentage is relatively lower when compared to cognitive and effective factors. External factors from the external side, family environmental support, although still low (inadequate learning facilities at home around 59.8%) also influence the process of learning to write short stories. The social environment that does not support literacy activities in the surrounding area is also an obstacle. In the school environment, less interesting learning methods (71.2% of students) and unsupportive school facilities (65.5% of students) further worsen the condition. Furthermore, teachers who provide less writing practice (77.0% of students) indicate that opportunities for structured writing practice are still minimal.