Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Educational Innovations for Sustainable Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review Ali Mujahidin; Budi Irawanto; Rika Pristian Fitri Astuti
Proceeding International Conference on Digital Education and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Proceeding International Conference on Digital Education and Social Science 202
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengelola Publikasi Ilmiah (APPI) PT PGRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55506/icdess.v3i1.122

Abstract

Higher education plays a vital role in supporting the social, economic, and cultural development of global societies. With the advancement of technology and increasing global demands, higher education institutions are required to continuously innovate in order to create relevant and sustainable learning experiences. This study aims to systematically review various educational innovations implemented in higher education to support sustainable learning. Using a PRISMA-based Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, 37 articles published between 2020 and 2024 were analyzed. The study identified three main categories of educational innovation: curriculum innovation, instructional innovation, and educational technology innovation. Curriculum innovations include the integration of sustainability principles and the development of 21st-century skills. Instructional innovations involve active learning approaches and personalized learning technologies. Meanwhile, technological innovations focus on the use of AI, AR/VR, and digital learning platforms that enhance interactive and inclusive learning experiences. Despite challenges such as infrastructure gaps, limited faculty training, and unequal access to technology, this study highlights the importance of integrated and sustainable approaches in implementing educational innovations. It provides evidence-based recommendations for higher education institutions to develop more relevant, inclusive, and sustainable learning practices.
Digital transformation model for higher education governance: an integration of business processes, human resources, and technology Ali Mujahidin; Zuhad Zuhad; Budi Irawanto
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i4.1129

Abstract

Digital transformation has become a strategic priority for higher education institutions to improve governance efficiency, service quality, and adaptability in a rapidly evolving digital environment. However, many universities still face challenges due to fragmented administrative processes, limited system integration, and insufficient organizational readiness. This study examines how digital transformation reshapes governance processes through the integration of business processes, human resources, and technological systems. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with six key informants in university management, including the rector, vice rector, IT manager, and academic staff. Data were analyzed using the Gioia methodology to identify emerging patterns. The findings reveal three key dimensions driving digital transformation: business process modernization, organizational and human resource adaptation, and technology integration. Business process modernization enhances efficiency through standardized digital workflows. Organizational and human resource adaptation supports the development of digital competencies and new work practices. Technology integration improves effectiveness through centralized data management, better coordination, and data-driven decision-making. This study proposes a conceptual model showing how these dimensions interact to strengthen digital governance. It highlights that successful digital transformation depends not only on technology adoption but also on the alignment of organizational processes, human capabilities, and technological infrastructure.