Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Hukum Pelaksanaan Perhutanan Sosial Di Kawasan Hutan Produksi Yang Telah Dikuasai Perusahaan Akhyar Idris Sagala; Muhammad Arifin; Faisal
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 3 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i3.5815

Abstract

Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa keberhasilan program perhutanan sosial dan reforma agraria sangat bergantung pada komitmen semua pihak untuk melaksanakannya secara konsisten. Dengan metode yuridis empiris, penelitian ini mengkaji pengaturan hukum, perlindungan masyarakat, serta pertanggungjawaban perusahaan dalam pelaksanaan perhutanan sosial di kawasan hutan produksi. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa regulasi telah diatur dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan, sementara perlindungan hukum bagi masyarakat tersedia melalui pengakuan legal, kerja sama, pendampingan, dan mekanisme penyelesaian konflik. Adapun perusahaan yang melanggar dapat dikenai sanksi administratif, perdata, maupun pidana sesuai tingkat pelanggaran yang dilakukan.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ISLAMIC INHERITANCE LAW ON INHERITANCE RIGHTS IN ACEH, REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA AND PATTANI, SOUTH THAILAND Imam A' Ardhana Lubis; Faisal
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18540971

Abstract

This study aims to determine the inheritance law systems in Aceh (Indonesia) and Pattani (Thailand), two regions with strong historical, cultural, and Islamic backgrounds. Aceh implements Islamic inheritance law integrated into the national legal system through the Sharia Court, while the Muslim community of Pattani practices Islamic inheritance law in a limited manner within the context of Thailand's secular national law. This study employed qualitative methods with a juridical-normative and sociological approach, through literature review, analysis of legislation, and an examination of social practices. The results show that although both regions adhere to the principles of Islamic inheritance law, there are significant differences in their application and formal legal force. In Aceh, Islamic inheritance law has strong legal legitimacy and is recognized by the state, while in Pattani, its application is more cultural and depends on the agreement of families and religious leaders. This research is expected to contribute to the comparative study of Islamic law and an understanding of the dynamics of the application of Islamic inheritance law in Muslim-majority and minority regions.
Restorative Justice In The Criminal Justice System: An Analysis of Sentencing Proportionality in the Crime of Embezzlement in Office Involving Minor Losses (An Analysis of the Stabat District Court Decision Number 214/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Stb) Muhammad Zakiri; Faisal; Tengku Erwinsyahbana
International Journal of Economic, Technology and Social Sciences (Injects) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : CERED Indonesia Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53695/injects.v6i2.1655

Abstract

This study examines the application of restorative justice to the crime of embezzlement in office involving minor losses, through a case study of the Stabat District Court Decision Number 214/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Stb. The issues discussed encompass the qualification of criminal acts that meet the requirements for restorative resolution, the orientation of criminal law enforcement, and judicial considerations in sentencing. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, this study finds that embezzlement in office with a loss value below the threshold prescribed by Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2012 qualifies as a minor offense and objectively meets the criteria for restorative justice. In the a quo decision, the judge imposed a 1 (one) year imprisonment sentence for a loss amounting to IDR 187,500.00. Resolution through restorative justice could not be implemented due to the absence of a settlement agreement from the victim. Nevertheless, the imposition of the custodial sentence is deemed to insufficiently reflect the principles of proportionality and legal utility. In this regard, the judge inherently possesses the authority to consider alternative sentencing options other than imprisonment, in alignment with the legal principle that positions imprisonment as an ultimum remedium.