Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Managing Crypto as a Business Asset in Prenuptial Agreements/Postnuptial Agreements Ummul Dwi Andina; Muryanto Lanontji; Andi Muhammad Jafar
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Interdisciplinary Social Studies
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i2.1032

Abstract

The growth of crypto asset investors in Indonesia will reach 20.9 million by August 2024, but the Marriage Law Number 1 of 1974 has not specifically regulated digital assets, both as joint property and personal property. This research aims to analyze the categorization of crypto assets as business assets that can be regulated through prenuptial and postnuptial agreements to protect the rights of each party. The research approach used is juridical-normative through a literature review of laws, government regulations, academic references, and relevant scientific works. The findings of the study show that crypto assets are grouped into movable objects that do not have a form according to Articles 499 and 503 of the Civil Code, and qualify as business assets because they function as taxable investment instruments. Therefore, the regulation of crypto assets in prenuptial agreements or postnuptial agreements based on Article 35 paragraph (2) jo. Article 29 of the Marriage Law is important to provide legal certainty regarding the status of ownership and division of property.
Music Royalty Obligations and Copyright Enforcement in Commercial Public Spaces: The Case of Cafés and Restaurants in Indonesia Dewi Ananda Putri; Muryanto Lanontji; Andi Muhammad Jafar
Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam Vol.11 No.1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam IAIN Bone

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30863/ajmpi.v11i1.11009

Abstract

Copyright constitutes a central pillar of intellectual property law in regulating the commercial exploitation of music as an economically valuable creative work. This article examines the legal obligation imposed on cafés and restaurants in Indonesia to pay music royalties under Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021, as an implementing instrument of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright. Despite the existence of a formal regulatory framework, widespread non-compliance among café and restaurant business operators persists, raising significant juridical concerns regarding enforcement legitimacy and proportionality. Employing a normative-juridical research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials to assess the normative basis and legal implications of mandatory royalty payment obligations. The analysis demonstrates that the use of music in cafés and restaurants constitutes a form of public performance or communication to the public, thereby generating enforceable royalty obligations grounded in creators’ exclusive economic rights. Non-compliance gives rise to layered juridical consequences, encompassing administrative enforcement, civil liability, and the potential application of criminal sanctions under Indonesian copyright law. By situating the Indonesian regulatory framework within broader debates on copyright governance, this article contributes to the international discourse by clarifying how collective royalty regimes recalibrate the legal position of small and medium-sized commercial users in public performance rights enforcement systems.